The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Y-Wings/X-Wings angle deflectors
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech -> Y-Wings/X-Wings angle deflectors
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
worfbacca
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 105

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 11:27 am    Post subject: Y-Wings/X-Wings angle deflectors Reply with quote

Why would the Y-Wings/Xwings angle their deflectors double front during the trench run if those large turbolaser batteries would just rip through them? Unfortunately we never see one of the big guns hit the starfighters.. or can they survive a few shots from it?
_________________
"That was left handed!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14213
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe they felt angling them that way, would possibly bounce off the shots??
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16320
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Technically, they didn’t angle them (the exact quote was “switch your deflectors on, double front"). However, WEG doesn’t really have a mechanism to represent doubling the front shield in a meaningful way. Y-Wings, for example, have 1D+2 in Shields (or 5 pips), so they could conceivably split their Shield Dice four ways: +1 to Left, Right and Rear, then +2 to Front. It’s technically “double front”, but only boosts the Y’s combined soak to 5D.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index


Last edited by CRMcNeill on Mon Nov 04, 2024 12:23 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
FVBonura
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 137
Location: Central PA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2024 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I rule Double Front as two arcs rotated 45 degrees to cover the forward 180 degrees. My players also use "Double Zenith" when on the ground to form a two-arc dome over the ship. As long as one arc is 25% of an ellipsoid, I don't care about the angle it is projected.

Also when calculating the Shield Die Score, I round up pips as I rule the closer to a sphere the shields are, the less energy it uses to form the shield's shape.
_________________
Star Wars Deckplans Alliance
Star Wars Prequel Commentary
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14213
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CRMcNeill wrote:
Technically, they didn’t angle them (the exact quote was “switch your deflectors on, double front"). However, WEG doesn’t really have a mechanism to represent doubling the front shield in a meaningful way. Y-Wings, for example, have 1D+2 in Shields (or 5 pips), so they could conceivably split their Shield Dice four ways: +1 to Left, Right and Rear, then +2 to Front. It’s technically “double front”, but only boosts the Y’s combined soak to 5D.


I thought the y-wings combined value was 5d+2 (4d hull +1d+2 shield)? May be mistaken as i am on my phone right now.. So can't look the pdf up.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16320
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2024 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Y-Wing Hull is 4D+1. Also, IIRC, you don’t combine pips into D under the circumstances, so technically the Y-Wing’s soak would be 4D+3, not 5D.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14213
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2024 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the hull is 4d+1 (above the 4d i thought), and shields are 1d+2, wouldn't that combine to 5d+3?
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16320
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2024 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

garhkal wrote:
If the hull is 4d+1 (above the 4d i thought), and shields are 1d+2, wouldn't that combine to 5d+3?

Yes, if you put the full 1D+2 in the Front Arc. I was speculating putting +1 in each arc, then an additional +1 in the front for +2, thus “double front”. That doesn’t mean I like it, though, and a shields house rule would likely produce better results.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Whill
Dark Lord of the Jedi (Owner/Admin)


Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 10435
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA, Earth, The Solar System, The Milky Way Galaxy

PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since the game is interpreting the universe of (primarily) the films into a game setting, maybe the Y-Wing should be statted better to reflect the film dialogue. A very easy way to make "double" possible would be to give the Y-Wing a Shields dice code that equates to an even number of pips, such as making it 2D or 1D+1.

What the film suggests to me is that the laser towers in the trench only shot at the Rebel fighters from the front, so they moved all shields to the forward arcs. Then they had to even the shields back out so they covered the rear too ("stabilize your rear deflectors") when Vader started chasing fighters in the trench and shooting them down.

Although, Death Star towers from the front would stop firing completely to not accidentally hit Vader and his wingmen, so the Rebels probably could have went "double rear".
_________________
*
Site Map
Forum Guidelines
Registration/Log-In Help
The Rancor Pit Library
Star Wars D6 Damage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14213
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 2:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unless they kept their front shields up, since they feared they might run into the side of the trench.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Whill
Dark Lord of the Jedi (Owner/Admin)


Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 10435
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA, Earth, The Solar System, The Milky Way Galaxy

PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 3:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

garhkal wrote:
Unless they kept their front shields up, since they feared they might run into the side of the trench.

My interpretation of the film was that "stabilize your rear deflectors" meant they did keep the front shields up, so front and rear were then evened-out to protect against both arcs. Sure, maybe they were concerned about turning a nose into the trench sides, or floor, or gun towers.
_________________
*
Site Map
Forum Guidelines
Registration/Log-In Help
The Rancor Pit Library
Star Wars D6 Damage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0