The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Running 'em over!?
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> House Rules -> Running 'em over!? Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14171
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 7:48 pm    Post subject: Running 'em over!? Reply with quote

Had a fellow gm send me details (along with some queries/comments) from her running of one of my modules. One of the biggest things i saw there, that made me go WTF over, was she had 1 pc run over 3 full squads (1 squad at a time) in a regular run of the mill speeder bike (like from ROTJ).

My thoughts, is while it could (if hit) knock down, and possibily even kill 2-3 troopers, there is no way it coulld take the entire squad down in 1 swoop, and by the time you maneuvered to come back to finish the job they would NOT be bunching up to suffer the same. And that is just the first squad...


So. What roll(s) would you say would have had to be involved.
How many could reasonabily get 'whakked' in one pass?
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Endwyn
Commander
Commander


Joined: 22 Jul 2005
Posts: 481

PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would say if in squad formation perhaps 8-12 depending on how tight they were. Of course to kill them, I would imagine you having to sharply turn the bike right before you "hit them" so that you would be hitting wide side, not narrow. Of course on top of that, I would (as a player) try to ensure they did die by engaging a maximum upward thrust off the repulsors right when I was passing over the troopers. The extra push should help do them in.

Downside is, if there are 3 squads, I might have crippled one but have left myself prone to the other two.
_________________
Luke, I am your father.
That's impossible!
And Leia is your sister!
That's improbable?
And the Empire will be destroyed by..EWOKS!
That's...highly unlikely.
The Force? Bacteria called midichlorians.
If you don’t take this seriously I'm out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Boomer
Captain
Captain


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 688
Location: Terra Sol

PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would simply use the collision rules. Because that is what they are for. Surprised

As for the number of people that can be hit. I would rule that the width of the speeder bike allows for one at a time hits for head on collisions, and that more rolls are needed to hit more people.

For manuvers other than a head on collision, like the side swipe mentioned by Endwyn, hitting multiple people would be much easier, it would require the roll for sideswipe difficulty, and coul be used to take out upwards of twelve people if done correctly.
_________________
My backpack has jets!
I'm Boba the Fett!
And I bounty hunt for Jabba Hutt,
to finance my 'vette!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Argamoth
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 234

PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd think that hitting a person would make the bike flip out of control.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jedi Skyler
Moff
Moff


Joined: 07 Sep 2005
Posts: 8440

PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And if not flip immediately out of control, surely the control vanes on the front of the bike (if the character simply did a head-on collision) would be seriously messed up, if not sheared off completely, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boomer
Captain
Captain


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 688
Location: Terra Sol

PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That is a possibility, also covered under collision rules.
You'd roll for damage to both, the character hit being capped to resist damage and capped to damage the speeder.
Than the one driving the speeder has to roll for keeping control of the bike.

The rule is already there. Just have to apply it to what is going on. Ramming a person with a speeder of any kind is a collision, use the collision rules, they work just as well.
_________________
My backpack has jets!
I'm Boba the Fett!
And I bounty hunt for Jabba Hutt,
to finance my 'vette!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
KageRyu
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 1391
Location: Lost in the cracks

PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't forget damage inflicted to the Speeder Bike for all these impacts. And the troopers would definately be allowed dodge rolls (taking scaling into acount). And after the first pass, that's 30+ stormtroopers from the other squads shooting at you.

Did the player have a lightsaber or vibroblade out and use it for some form of Slash attack as he passed? That is the only way I could see this working effectively.
_________________
"There's a set way to gain new Force Points and it represents a very nice system, where you're rewarded for heroism, not for being a poor conductor to electricity." ~Jachra
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14171
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I posted what i know of the situation, from what she sent me. In my email response, i did bereate her a little for allowing something like this, without giving proper consideration, to the enemies intelligence. IMO stormies are trained enough, they would not be bunched up enough to allow this. I also asked what rolls/skills she required etc. So hopefully, soon, we will have more information.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14171
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Side question. Would you all consider, 3 planned combats for a 4 hr session, and possibily 2-3 more unplanned ones to much for a base raid?
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 105

PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, KageRyu, but i donīt see dodging sacle modifiers work here correctly. If it would work that way, i could easily dodge stardestroyer crashlanding on me. - I canīt.

You might dodge, but you should add a circumstance modifier for the velocity and the size of the vehicle. I would also let the driver roll a very difficult or heroic manoever roll because of the collision. But it might kill quite a bunch of stromtroopers imho.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boomer
Captain
Captain


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 688
Location: Terra Sol

PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I still say the collision rules already cover every aspect of this.

As for Garkhals second question, no that is not too much combat for going into a combat situation. It may take more than 4 hours, or it may swiftly breeze by.
_________________
My backpack has jets!
I'm Boba the Fett!
And I bounty hunt for Jabba Hutt,
to finance my 'vette!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14171
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about, say for going on a 'bank robbery raid'.. IMO you could have 2 possible ground combats (the raid itself, and one possible enroute to the space port) and say 1 for the escape in space/atmosphere.... Would that be too much?
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chabit Rane
Commander
Commander


Joined: 02 Nov 2005
Posts: 460

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No i would not. Although, I would make them fairly short unless it played into the story. Namely the one enroute to the spaceport (just remember, no one can outrun a communications Twisted Evil ).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Boomer
Captain
Captain


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 688
Location: Terra Sol

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indeed, not too much combat there for the bank robbery. The three planned is enough.
_________________
My backpack has jets!
I'm Boba the Fett!
And I bounty hunt for Jabba Hutt,
to finance my 'vette!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14171
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chabit Rane wrote:
Namely the one enroute to the spaceport (just remember, no one can outrun a communications Twisted Evil ).


Yup. When i was in Bahrain, as part of the ASF (auxillary security force), we were told, never chase a runner if he is heading towards any of the gates, just call it in...
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> House Rules All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0