The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

coordinated fire from massed enemies
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Official Rules -> coordinated fire from massed enemies Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Galadrin
Cadet
Cadet


Joined: 20 Jun 2013
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Barrataria wrote:
Another refugee from Dragonsfoot! Smile Haven't seen that username in a while.


Haha, indeed! I was a huge fan of your B/X stuff Barr : )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Barrataria
Commander
Commander


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 295
Location: Republic of California

PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:38 pm    Post subject: I see Reply with quote

Thanks galadrin!

garhkal wrote:
Well as a military brat its not really a full on squad you are commanding.
It breaks down like this
Platoon leader commands 3-4 squad leaders.
Squad leaders command 3 fire team leaders and their grenadier.
Each fire team leader commands the 3 members of his fire team.
So at most via the 2e rules each officer needs 4d in command to successfully command the group.


Elegantly stated... and assumes all in communication, I suppose, which I don't think is mentioned in R&E.
_________________
"A special effect without a story is a pretty boring thing"- George Lucas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jmanski
Arbiter-General (Moderator)


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 2065
Location: Kansas

PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would take time for the orders to filter down, though....
_________________
Blasted rules. Why can't they just be perfect?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dromdarr_Alark
Commander
Commander


Joined: 07 Apr 2013
Posts: 426
Location: Boston, MA

PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

garhkal wrote:
Well as a military brat its not really a full on squad you are commanding.
It breaks down like this
Platoon leader commands 3-4 squad leaders.
Squad leaders command 3 fire team leaders and their grenadier.
Each fire team leader commands the 3 members of his fire team.
So at most via the 2e rules each officer needs 4d in command to successfully command the group.


That makes sense to me!
_________________
"I still wouldn't have a roll for it - but that's just how I roll."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:29 am    Post subject: Re: I see Reply with quote

Barrataria wrote:

Elegantly stated... and assumes all in communication, I suppose, which I don't think is mentioned in R&E.


Thanks. As for the comms issue, since most pc's in battle keep open mikes to one another (or storm troopers with their tongue activated helmet mikes) that should be easy to do.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Esoomian
High Admiral
High Admiral


Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 6207
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As jmanski mentions it would take time for the orders to filter down though.

Even though listening doesn't normally incur a MAP I'd be inclined to add a MAP for every step in the chain if they wanted to make sure they all fired in the same round that the order was given. To me that rolls into the fact that orders are given in a chain rather than all at once so you sacrifice speed for co-ordination.

So they can hear the order, pass it down the chain and have everyone ready to fire on the next round (no MAPs) or they can attempt to fire as soon as the order is given and have a penalty to the command roll.

For garhkal's example:
Platoon leader - "Squad leaders, fire everything you have at that tank now!"
Squad leaders (1 MAP) "Okay team leaders get your guys ready and all hit that tank!"
Team leaders (2 MAPs) "Okay guys everyone hit that tank now!"
_________________
Don't waste money on expensive binoculars.

Simply stand closer to the object you wish to view.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I could see that..
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Esoomian
High Admiral
High Admiral


Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 6207
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of course that means that the lower you are in the chain the higher your command needs to be to counteract the MAPs... unless big military groups always spend a round to co-ordinate actions.
_________________
Don't waste money on expensive binoculars.

Simply stand closer to the object you wish to view.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
atgxtg
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Posts: 2460

PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe instead of a MAP it just takes extra time, like a round per step in the chain. Realistically, it probably should take at least a round per step to coordinate, probably more like double the time per step.

I just don't see somebody really able to coordinate all the turbolasers on an ISD in one round.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Esoomian
High Admiral
High Admiral


Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 6207
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That works too.
_________________
Don't waste money on expensive binoculars.

Simply stand closer to the object you wish to view.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

atgxtg wrote:
Maybe instead of a MAP it just takes extra time, like a round per step in the chain. Realistically, it probably should take at least a round per step to coordinate, probably more like double the time per step.

I just don't see somebody really able to coordinate all the turbolasers on an ISD in one round.


A ship i agree, but in a ground battle, getting your squad to coordinate is imo ok for an action.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Esoomian
High Admiral
High Admiral


Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 6207
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So when you're co-ordinating groups of people aiming and firing hand weapons then each step is a MAP but when you're co-ordinating groups of gunners calibrating and aiming guns then each step is a round?

That makes sense and it allows large groups of trained and discipled people to be powerful without just being instant death to anything.
_________________
Don't waste money on expensive binoculars.

Simply stand closer to the object you wish to view.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And if you use one of the HRs i have put into play that the sparks group liked enough to adopt "Supression fire" that adds to the difficulty of enemy units TO co-ordinate fire.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Esoomian
High Admiral
High Admiral


Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 6207
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That makes sense but does suppression fire do less damage because you're not focusing your attacks on kill shots just making sure the enemy has their head down?
_________________
Don't waste money on expensive binoculars.

Simply stand closer to the object you wish to view.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When i wrote supression fire out, you rolled base damage against the area, but the difficulty to hit went up based on how big it was.. Then those in it got to dodge out to avoid damage. The way supression fire worked in sparks is only ADDS to the base difficulty to command a group of troops (or fighters etc), it does no damage..
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Official Rules All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0