The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

EXECUTOR CLASS ( Funny canon "error?")
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech -> EXECUTOR CLASS ( Funny canon "error?")
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mamatried
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 16 Dec 2017
Posts: 1861
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:40 pm    Post subject: EXECUTOR CLASS ( Funny canon "error?") Reply with quote

I was reading up about the battle of jakku, and noticed the executor, i was checking out the new canon length if any.
It was set to 19 000 meters, however that is not what actually caught my eye.

it was this "...and utilizing its thirteen engine thrusters,[2] could reach speeds of 100 kilometers per hour."

Only 100s of kilometes pr hour? LOL

No wonder the empire lost


http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Executor-class_Star_Dreadnought Embarassed Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16320
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm strongly considering asking Whill to make this my new avatar. It pretty much encapsulates my opinions on the state of the SWU at the moment...



Apparently the source is something called Ultimate Star Wars. Does anyone own a copy and can double-check this? I really do hope it's just a typo.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mamatried
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 16 Dec 2017
Posts: 1861
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do too.
but you never know these days.
I am sure maybe the falcon can do at least 150 km/h
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Whill
Dark Lord of the Jedi (Owner/Admin)


Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 10436
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA, Earth, The Solar System, The Milky Way Galaxy

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CRMcNeill wrote:
Apparently the source is something called Ultimate Star Wars. Does anyone own a copy and can double-check this? I really do hope it's just a typo.

I have Ultimate Star Wars, but it doesn't give the Executor's speed and that is not the citation in the Wookieepedia article. Ultimate Star Wars is cited for the 13 engines thrusters. The 100kph speed and the crew numbers are cited as from Star Wars Encyclopedia of Starfighters and Other Vehicles, which I also have.

Yes, that book does say 100 kph.

And yes, it is obviously a typo. (It is right across from the Imp I which it says has a speed of 975 kph.) Star Wars Encyclopedia of Starfighters and Other Vehicles just came out this year. Until the typo is officially corrected in a more modern source, the 100kph is not out of place on the Wookieepedia page.

It's "The 100kph Fallacy"! Because ship length wasn't enough to screw up for that ship! lol
_________________
*
Site Map
Forum Guidelines
Registration/Log-In Help
The Rancor Pit Library
Star Wars D6 Damage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Pel
Line Captain
Line Captain


Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 983
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm thinking 'k' is a reference to the Japanese ken, or 6.95 ft. So if we assume they're talking about the Micromachine-scale toys, the speed looks about right.

Yeah, I really had to dig for that one.
_________________
Aha!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darklighter79
Captain
Captain


Joined: 27 May 2018
Posts: 529

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 7:26 pm    Post subject: Re: EXECUTOR CLASS ( Funny canon "error?") Reply with quote

Mamatried wrote:

Only 100s of kilometes pr hour? LOL

Well, after seeing magnificent speed of MG-100 StarFortress SF-17, I sometimes wonder...Wink
A typo obviously. But why Wookiepedia copies it without any second thoughts?
But still, all those so called WEG's maxed atmo speeds, do not feel too bound by those.
Ships travel "slowly" during landing approach or combat, but when leaving the atmosphere, main drive kicks in and gives significant boost, so they go hypersonic instantly: 1. Original X-Wing launch in Ep. IV
2. Noa's ship leaving (main drives activates at 1:17:19)
3. Canto Bait escape (sorry no link)
4. E.T. leaving (if you consider it as semi-canon)
_________________
Don’t Let the Rules Get in the Way of a Good Story.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mamatried
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 16 Dec 2017
Posts: 1861
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I personally use the max atmosphere speed as that, max.
and to me they make much more sense on fighters and small freighters than on hge capital ships, which to me are so huge that even with considerable speed, though much less than fighters will appear to be gliding slowly.

I would though agree that ships like a star destroyer would be gliding fairly slowly in atmosphere and most likely have little if no comparable manuverability compared to when in space.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0