View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Vanion Lieutenant
Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 96 Location: Austin, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tahlorn wrote: | How my group does it:
We avoid the whole situation by NEVER running into Vader, Luke, Han, Lando, etcetra. Why? Because then it feels like we are going on a tour, not an adventure. If we run a scene from a movie, then there are no surprises. No creativity. It is already set. We never deal with being a key part of the rebellion during times in the movies, because we will know fgrom the beginning what happens. "You are supposed to gain the plans for the second Death Star the Imps are building." "Great, so what, almost all of us are gonig to die, right?" "And now you are on the battle of Hoth!" "Goody! Watch me run away from my post and find a seat on the evacuation ship, becasue we are not going to win this!" The galaxy is a big place, there is more to it than just the movies. We will be given a time period in regards to the movies so we know what has gone on already, but we never do anything that alters history. And for that I am glad. Otherwise, I would wait for when we go down to Tatooien aroudn Episode 1, where I put a blaster to the right temple of "little anny". Solve a whole lot of problems by just moving my finger half an inch back against a trigger.
|
I know that this is just a matter of preference, but players that I have played with have liked the idea of being in or near to a scene right out of the movie. I don't think they are concerned with not having any surprises because they are simply excited to feel like a real part of the Star Wars movies... and also with my approach... they CAN alter the outcome (with much dificulty, though... wouldn't be easy for them) of a Star Wars scene. Those are the times when I really see players' eyes light up, and they sit up just a little straighter in their chair. The outcomes from moments right out of the movies are only known, boring, and pre-set if the GM and his players want it that way. It's all a matter of what your preference is.
Also... we have a focus toward roleplaying. So... I wouldn't allow a player to take an action that would change the furture unless he/she had a good in-character reason for. I don't see any of our characters having a reason to blow little Anakin away... perhaps a bounty Hunter character would have a reason for killing Luke after Ep4, since there was a bounty posted for him, though. Since Anakin was a slave... I might let a player "buy" him to set him free (which would be interesting)... or if they had a VERY VERY VERY good reason, keep Anakin with him/her, since Anakin would technically be his/her property. _________________ "Life is not measured in years, but by deeds" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedi Skyler Moff
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 8440
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vanion wrote: | I know that this is just a matter of preference, but players that I have played with have liked the idea of being in or near to a scene right out of the movie. I don't think they are concerned with not having any surprises because they are simply excited to feel like a real part of the Star Wars movies... and also with my approach... they CAN alter the outcome (with much dificulty, though... wouldn't be easy for them) of a Star Wars scene. Those are the times when I really see players' eyes light up, and they sit up just a little straighter in their chair. The outcomes from moments right out of the movies are only known, boring, and pre-set if the GM and his players want it that way. It's all a matter of what your preference is.
Also... we have a focus toward roleplaying. So... I wouldn't allow a player to take an action that would change the furture unless he/she had a good in-character reason for. I don't see any of our characters having a reason to blow little Anakin away... perhaps a bounty Hunter character would have a reason for killing Luke after Ep4, since there was a bounty posted for him, though. Since Anakin was a slave... I might let a player "buy" him to set him free (which would be interesting)... or if they had a VERY VERY VERY good reason, keep Anakin with him/her, since Anakin would technically be his/her property. |
I like this approach. The reaction of Vanion's players is consistent with every group I've been in so far; it always adds just a little bit of depth to our own story line when we see it meshing directly with events from the movies. It allowed us just a sliver of "ownership", if you will, (and I use the term loosely, George!) in the films; it ties us to them in ways not achieveable through the movies alone.
The fact that he allows them to TRY to alter events, but makes it very hard to do so, gives nods to both canon and the spirit of the RPG; it allows the characters to truly do anything they wish within the SW universe, but also imposes consequences for those actions so they can't just run willy-nilly and wreak incalculable havoc. It's the best compromise between the two camps- those who adhere "strictly to canon" and those who adhere to the "freedom of the game." Kudos, Vanion! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14171 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yup. One of the few times i have had a gm put us in a possible continuity breaking situation, he stringently reminded us that any action based on what we knew, not what our characters knew would be severly punished. Then he had us meet Moff Tarkin on Corsuscant, the day he was getting advanced to sector Moff.... _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedi Skyler Moff
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 8440
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You should ALWAYS make the players go on character knowledge, not player knowledge. The GM was right.
The only way I'd let characters alter history just any old where would be if they're going strictly on character knowledge, but if it were announced up front that such actions were allowed, encouraged, etc. I'd hate to get halfway through a campaign I'd worked real hard on just to have the players do like Volar's player did- "Hey, we wanna kill Vader!" He had to break to do more planning because he wasn't expecting it. Had it been announced up front he'd have been much more ready to roll right on through, because with the amount of planning he reportedly does for his campaigns, he'd have already thought of that and been ready to orchestrate it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darius Sub-Lieutenant
Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 57 Location: Aucks, New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Palpatine could always promote another to replace Vader. Such as High Inquisitor Tremayne or a Dark Side Adept from Byss such as Sedriss. _________________ oops - i didnt mean to make it go off |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Demona Cadet
Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 16 Location: Rio Rancho, NM
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Speaking strictly as a player and not a GM whatso ever I love seeing actual parts of the movie in game play.
I mean common...If the Death Star appears infront of your players if they are really star wars fans I can guarentee all of them will get the chills.
As a player there is just something about seeing Han or Luke...or even minor characters of the movies while in character. I don't know about anyone else but yea...I wanted to be Princess Leia when I grew up, or even just in the movies as me. So when I see them ingame its as close to actually being in the movies I will ever be and there is something thrilling about that. In all the sessions I have ever played in, the ones where my characters met people from the movies are the sessions I had the most fun in.
You can't meet your hero's everyday and when you do ingame there is just something magical about it. _________________ So uh...I rolled a 1 on the wild die...is that good? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gry Sarth Jedi
Joined: 25 May 2004 Posts: 5304 Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with you Demona, meeting movie NPC or witnessing movie-related scenes is always a rush. However these things should be used sparingly, otherwise they lose their effectiveness. If you're always running into Han every corner you turn, it makes him less special and the encounters less memorable.
Sometimes just the use of a prop is enough to send chills. A while ago I had my players go to an auction, and one of the items was that relief mural Palpatine has in his office in Ep3. The young jedi in the group was baffled by the dark side aurea the object exuded..... _________________ "He's Gry Sarth, of course he has the stats for them." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Demona Cadet
Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 16 Location: Rio Rancho, NM
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
As an example.
In one of our games we are playing a merchant campaign and we were just leaving Alderaan after dropping off some cargo and picking up passengers. Right after we left the spaceport getting ready to engage the hyperdrive our sensors went off saying that the space directly infront of us was occupied. Then The Death Star appeared and our pilot make a roll to avoid crashing into it...
Yes...we knew Alderaan was about to become an asteroid field, yes we knew Han Luke and Ben would be arriving within the next few days, yes we could have made a stupid attempt to ram it or something else silly like that. But we didn't. We all got this nervous excitement and started talking really fast. And all we did was rubberneck it while we took off to a different planet.
*takes a deep breath*
BUT WE SAW THE DEATH STAR!!!! HOW COOL IS THAT!! *wiggles in her chair* That was by far one of the best things that had ever happened to us as players, I think. It reminded us we were playing "Star Wars" and not "Space Opera".
But then again I am easily amused... _________________ So uh...I rolled a 1 on the wild die...is that good? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedi Skyler Moff
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 8440
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
*wiggles in chair right next to her* Yeah, that would have been great.
In one campaign I was in, we ran across a lower level Dark Jedi. Boy,was my character (a Jedi in training) ever nervous! It was all he could do to keep his Force presence completely closed down so he didn't get detected. We were all jittery, wondering how that one was going to come off; at that point my Jedi wasn't nearly strong enough to take him on, and we managed to get away from him without actually engaging him.
Now imagine if that had been Darth Vader... My Jedi probably wouldn't have left the scene! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14171 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly how did you 'shut down your force presence'??? _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedi Skyler Moff
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 8440
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Most everyone has a presence in the Force; the rest have a distinct absence in the Force. Jedi are taught how to reign in their sense and bring up shields to keep their Force presence in. (There are many examples of this being done in the novels.) While this leaves the Jedi Force-blind, unable to sense anything, it also holds in his presence in the Force, keeping him from being detected.
Remember how in ROTJ Luke was hiding out in the Emperor's throne room, and Vader was walking around looking for him? Although Vader was able to pick out some of his surface thoughts, prompted by the taunting Vader was doing, he didn't know exactly where Luke was. Luke was concentrating, pulling in his Force sense so he could better hide. It didn't (and doesn't necessarily or always) completely hide the fact that a person is present, just the fact that a Force-user is present. Luke basically made a good enough roll that his general presence in the room was known, but couldn't be pinpointed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14171 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know what it is, as far as in 'story' effect, but how IN GAME did you do that... _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedi Skyler Moff
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 8440
|
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
At that time we didn't have any powers that would achieve that effect. These days I suppose I'd have to have learned Emptiness, although that power gives you benefits when you come out of the trance. What I was doing was simply closing myself off to avoid being sensed. In game, I told my GM that I was putting up mental shields and "closing down" my Force presence to make myself harder to detect. He asked me what I meant exactly, and when I explained it to him he told me it would keep me from using any Force powers until I opened back up. I told him I knew that and was more concerned with avoiding detection at that point. He allowed it without any dice rolls, which may or may not have been appropriate. Even though I'd seem a bit biased since it was my character, if I were presented with this as a GM now, I'd allow it mostly without a dice check because all the character would be doing is closing himself up. If there were a lot of distractions around (i.e. in the middle of a battle, etc.) then I'd probably call for a Control roll at least. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14171 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, unless he has been trained to do something like that, how can he be certain he is indeed shutting down?>?>? _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedi Skyler Moff
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 8440
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By the fact that he can't Sense anything. Even a Force-sensitive with the barest modicum of Sense in the Force would KNOW that they could no longer Sense anything outside themselves. That would be the indicator of success.
In some of the books I've read (as well as my own humble opinion) putting up shields is one of the first things a Force user is taught. This helps them from broadcasting to others, as well as battering other Force-sensitives with the constant 'static' of their unshielded thoughts. Many of the books I've read have Jedi using this concept when their emotions are running a bit out of control, so they aren't bothering their companions (or being CAUGHT by their companions due to darker thought racing through their heads.) I've always understood this to be something akin to running through a Jedi calming technique- something that could be done anywhere, anytime, without a die roll.
As to the "unless they've had training in this," I suppose there are going to be basically two schools of thought. The first would maintain that the individual in question must be taught to do something of this nature, for whatever reason. The second would figure that the individual already knows what it's like to be without that extra Sense, because the first time they actually TOUCHED the Force pursposely, it feels like they've been blind up to that point, and so theoretically could work their way backward instinctively. They'd already know the effect they want, would know what it felt like already, and since it's shutting OFF their connection to the Force, rather than trying to utilize or deepen it, it would be nothing to make happen.
Of course, in the end, it's going to be the GM's call whether or not to allow this (or to even mention it as a possibility. In your own case, garkhal, I strongly suspect that IF you even allowed it, you'd make the player come up with it on his own... which is completely fine. Make that player use his brain! 8) ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|