The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Stability
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> House Rules -> Stability
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jtanzer
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 01 Mar 2023
Posts: 118

PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2024 3:59 am    Post subject: Stability Reply with quote

Right now I'm writing a campaign sourcebook for a homebrew sector, and I'm having trouble with the main mechanic. That mechanic, which right I'm calling Stability (because I'm unimaginative) is intended to be a measure of how strong and influential a faction is. Right now, the most I've been able to come up with as far as mechanics go is that completing missions and helping a faction will make it grow stronger (very original of me, I know). This would tie into the larger web of diplomatic relationships. The end goal is one where the various factions react to the gameworld in a dynamic and logical faction.

The basic guidelines I've come up with are:
    1. Stability can have positive and negative values, though it can only ever be positive or negative. Positive stability represents a healthy economy, strong military, a cohesive society, and diplomatic pull. Negative stability represents a poor economy, weak military, fractured society, and little diplomatic influence.
    2. Stability will move towards the extremes (i.e. factions with positive stability will continue to be positive, and factions with negative stability will continue to be negative)
    3. Weaker factions will ally with or against stronger factions depending on current diplomatic perception.
    4. Faction Stability is independent of each other.
    5. At intervals there will be faction missions that act as 'checkpoints' if you will where a weaker faction can either grow stronger or become weaker. Succeeding at one of these missions will give a temporary boost to that faction's stability, increase relations between that faction and the PCs, and 'lock in' the stability value that triggered the mission, preventing stability from falling below that value . Failing that mission will have the opposite effect, and instead of preventing stability from falling below a certain value, it will lower the maxiumum positive stability value.

_________________
The best villians are the ones the PCs create.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16320
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2024 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don’t have much to offer on an initial read through, but I recall WotC having rules for Organization Stats in their Force Unleashed sourcebook. Might give you some ideas.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14212
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2024 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is 'stability' mostly a backround factor in game? IE if a pc makes a politics roll, or bureaucracy roll, if his 'faction' has positive stability that roll would be made at a lower difficulty?
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jtanzer
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 01 Mar 2023
Posts: 118

PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2024 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

garhkal wrote:
Is 'stability' mostly a backround factor in game? IE if a pc makes a politics roll, or bureaucracy roll, if his 'faction' has positive stability that roll would be made at a lower difficulty?

I hadn't thought that far ahead, however I'm not a fan of lowering difficulty numbers. He probably would get a bonus though.

CRMcNeill wrote:

I don’t have much to offer on an initial read through, but I recall WotC having rules for Organization Stats in their Force Unleashed sourcebook. Might give you some ideas.

I'll have to take a look. I'm not a huge fan of WotC, so I'll poke around and see.
_________________
The best villians are the ones the PCs create.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> House Rules All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0