The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

MAPs and Wounds Tracker
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Tools -> MAPs and Wounds Tracker
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dph
Lieutenant
Lieutenant


Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 95

PostPosted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:49 pm    Post subject: MAPs and Wounds Tracker Reply with quote

Has anyone found any interesting chart/trackers for your current MAPs and Wound Penalty?

I've been looking at designing one myself but it gets very complicated in the case of MAPs when you draw your weapon or set to stun, then take a reaction parry etc.

Similarly it gets complicated with damage when you have a wound, then you get a couple of stuns on different rounds.

We've always just 'worked it out' but i'm thinking of a sheet you can just move dice (or counters) around on to keep track of the number of rounds as well as the MAP. Or in the case of wounds, your current static Penalty of wounds and cumulative stuns and whilst keeping track of when stuns wear off.
_________________
Check out my campaign and others on Obsidian Portal!

http://www.obsidianportal.com/campaigns/roguetraders
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrNexx
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 25 Mar 2016
Posts: 2248
Location: San Antonio

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm something of a fan of the "counter" method. While I tend to use poker chips for CPs and FPs, I could also see you using them as convenient counters.

Every 1D of wound penalty is a red chip. Every 1D of MAP is a blue chip. Round ends, hand back your blue chips, and get them out for your declared actions.
_________________
"I've Seen Your Daily Routine. You Are Not Busy!"
“We're going to win this war, not by fighting what we hate, but saving what we love.”
http://rpgcrank.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RyanDarkstar
Commander
Commander


Joined: 04 Dec 2014
Posts: 351
Location: Chambersburg, PA, USA, Earth

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Star Wars Miniatures Battles 2nd Ed book has simple square wound markers as well as templates for AoE (smoke, proton torpedo, grenade, flame, etc.).
_________________
Currently playing D&D 5E and painting an unholy amount of miniatures.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14213
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MrNexx wrote:
I'm something of a fan of the "counter" method. While I tend to use poker chips for CPs and FPs, I could also see you using them as convenient counters.

Every 1D of wound penalty is a red chip. Every 1D of MAP is a blue chip. Round ends, hand back your blue chips, and get them out for your declared actions.


I can see that. Add in a white chip to represent a MAP for an 'action' that is a cost for MAPS but not a cost for actions in the init order. Like switching to stun, reloading a mag/powre pack, drawing the weapon etc..
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naaman
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 3190

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I assume that "setting to stun" counts as an action by RAW? If so, I'd overrule that as GM... just one more little headache to track, and far, far, far from realistic unless setting to stun requires reconfiguring the weapon (as opposed to just flipping a switch).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bren
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 19 Aug 2010
Posts: 3868
Location: Maryland, USA

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naaman wrote:
I assume that "setting to stun" counts as an action by RAW? If so, I'd overrule that as GM... just one more little headache to track, and far, far, far from realistic unless setting to stun requires reconfiguring the weapon (as opposed to just flipping a switch).
Last time I checked it counts as a MAP but is not an action. So if you have Blasters 6D and you decide to switch to stun and shoot twice. You have MAP of -2D (switch setting + 2 shots) and your first shot happens during the first set of actions. Remember everyone's firsts action occurs before anyone's second action. (Unless you are using the optional Haste rules, but let's not go there.) This is all pretty much what G said.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14213
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup. Setting to stun. Reloading. Drawing a weapon. ALL count as "Actions" for multiple action penalties. BUT DON'T count as an action for your initiative order..
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Tools All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0