The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Corellian Engineering Corporation YT-1900 Space Transport
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech -> Corellian Engineering Corporation YT-1900 Space Transport Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 4:35 am    Post subject: Corellian Engineering Corporation YT-1900 Space Transport Reply with quote



YT-1900 Transport
Type: Corellian Engineering Corporation YT-1900 Space Transport
Era: Old Republic
Affiliation: General
Source: Marcus Starkiller
Scale: Starfighter
Length: 26.2m
Skill: Space Transports - YT-1900
Crew: 1 (Gunners:1)
Crew Skill: varies
Passengers: 8
Consumables: 3 Months
Cargo Capacity: 120 tons
Cost: 110,000 (new); 27,000 (used)
Hyperdrive Multiplier: X2
Hyperdrive Backup: X12
Nav Computer: Yes
Space: 6
Atmosphere: 700; 1200 km/h
Maneuverability: 2D
Hull: 4D
Shields: 2D
Sensors:
-- Passive: 15/0D
-- Scan: 30/1D
-- Search: 50/2D
-- Focus: 2/3D
Weapons:
Laser Cannon
-- Fire Arc: Turret
-- Skill: Starship Gunnery
-- Scale: Starfighter
-- Fire Control: 2D
-- Space Range: 1-3/15/25
-- Atmosphere Range: 100-300/1.5/2.5km
-- Damage: 4D

Capsule: The YT-1900 is a later model from CEC, and is heavily based on the hugely successful YT-1300, with an off-center cockpit, cargo loading arms, and many other features familiar to those who have flown the YT-1300. Slightly bulkier, but with more powerful engines, the YT-1900 can carry larger cargoes, which are loaded through a forward mounted cargo hatch, leaving the lower ramps free for use by crew and passengers. However should the front hatch not be available, or useable, then the lower ramps can still be used as in other older designs. While opinions have been mainly positive about the YT-1900, the only major complaint has been about the turrets placement, since its field of fire is somewhat blocked by the large engine housings that run along the top of the vessel, but as with all turret placements the fire of fire always depends on good interaction between the pilot and gunner. As with previous YT series ships, the turret can be locked into a forwards firing position, and fired by the pilot if he is flying the ship solo. The YT-1900 has sold in good numbers and looks to be as big a success as the other YT freighters. [/b]
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DirkCorman
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like that a lot! A brilliant design as well!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheshire
Arbiter-General (Moderator)


Joined: 04 Jan 2004
Posts: 4849

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's the source for this bad boy?
_________________
__________________________________
Before we take any of this too seriously, just remember that in the middle episode a little rubber puppet moves a spaceship with his mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cheshire wrote:
What's the source for this bad boy?


I don't think there is any source. I believe its 100% fan based.
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cheshire
Arbiter-General (Moderator)


Joined: 04 Jan 2004
Posts: 4849

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice. Someone did a really good job on the image. Can I ask where you found it?
_________________
__________________________________
Before we take any of this too seriously, just remember that in the middle episode a little rubber puppet moves a spaceship with his mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cheshire wrote:
Nice. Someone did a really good job on the image. Can I ask where you found it?


The image can be found on a Google images search. Though I found it from the page where the stats are. The page is linked to the authour in the sources section.
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16281
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a very eye-catching ship. However...

If the cockpit is the same size as that on the Millennium Falcon, then this ship's hull is noticeably smaller than that of the YT-1300. As such, I don't see how it could have a cargo capacity of 120 metric tons and still be able to carry 8 passengers.

On top of that, this ship greatly outperforms the YT-1300 with a minimal increase in price. To compare:
    YT-1900 vs. YT-1300

    Passengers: 8 vs. 6
    Cargo Capacity: 120mt vs. 100mt
    Consumables: 3 months vs. 2 months
    Cost: 110,000 / 27,000 vs. 100,000 / 25,000
    Space: 6 vs. 4
    Maneuverability: 2D vs. 0D
    Shields: 2D vs. 0D
    Sensors:
    -Passive: 15/0D vs. 10/0D
    -Scan: 30/1D vs. 25/1D
    -Search: 50/2D vs. 40/2D
    -Focus: 2/3D vs. 2/3D

In summary, this vessel shows a major increase in a whole swath of performance factors with a minimal increase in price. Something has to give...
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crmcneill wrote:
In summary, this vessel shows a major increase in a whole swath of performance factors with a minimal increase in price. Something has to give...


I would just assume this is perhaps a modified version. I suppose if we go that we can backtrack logically to a stock statblock. Though I agree about the cargo space being to big. Again not mine but someone else's. So let's make some changes. Once I get in front of the comp instead of my tablet I will take a closer look. Of course I am not all-knowing D6 guy, others certainly are encouraged to make suggestions.
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ral_Brelt
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 05 May 2013
Posts: 221

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 3:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Off-hand I'd view this ship as more of a blockade runner style of transport than the 1300 general workhorse. That being said, I'd say drop the cargo to 40-60 tons, passengers to 2 plus crew of 2 and shave off the shields in favor of keeping the maneuverability. You could keep the space speed the same as well, figuring that oversized engines account for the maneuverability and speed as well as the lack of cargo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bobmalooga
Commander
Commander


Joined: 13 Sep 2010
Posts: 367
Location: The south...

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ral_Brelt wrote:
Off-hand I'd view this ship as more of a blockade runner style of transport than the 1300 general workhorse. That being said, I'd say drop the cargo to 40-60 tons, passengers to 2 plus crew of 2 and shave off the shields in favor of keeping the maneuverability. You could keep the space speed the same as well, figuring that oversized engines account for the maneuverability and speed as well as the lack of cargo.


If you're looking at the pic, it seems slightly larger than the 1760, which is 6 meters smaller...I'd say at best, judging strictly on size between 20-30 tons of cargo and that would be pushing it.
_________________
No matter where you go, there you are...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14171
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2015 4:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crmcneill wrote:
This is a very eye-catching ship. However...

If the cockpit is the same size as that on the Millennium Falcon, then this ship's hull is noticeably smaller than that of the YT-1300. As such, I don't see how it could have a cargo capacity of 120 metric tons and still be able to carry 8 passengers.

On top of that, this ship greatly outperforms the YT-1300 with a minimal increase in price. To compare:
    YT-1900 vs. YT-1300

    Passengers: 8 vs. 6
    Cargo Capacity: 120mt vs. 100mt
    Consumables: 3 months vs. 2 months
    Cost: 110,000 / 27,000 vs. 100,000 / 25,000
    Space: 6 vs. 4
    Maneuverability: 2D vs. 0D
    Shields: 2D vs. 0D
    Sensors:
    -Passive: 15/0D vs. 10/0D
    -Scan: 30/1D vs. 25/1D
    -Search: 50/2D vs. 40/2D
    -Focus: 2/3D vs. 2/3D

In summary, this vessel shows a major increase in a whole swath of performance factors with a minimal increase in price. Something has to give...


Plus its size makes the internals look a lot smaller than a 1300 has, so where is all that extra coming from.
Also, where is the turret? I don't even see one in the pic.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 3:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

garhkal wrote:
Plus its size makes the internals look a lot smaller than a 1300 has, so where is all that extra coming from.


So make some suggestions? Easy to point out problems harder to make suggestions to fix them.

Quote:
Also, where is the turret? I don't even see one in the pic.


Well as we cannot see the bottom of the ship and game mechanically it doesn't matter, I would say the turret is on the bottom of the ship. As you pointed as you don't see one on the top or sides, so logically it has to be underneath =)
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bobmalooga
Commander
Commander


Joined: 13 Sep 2010
Posts: 367
Location: The south...

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 4:20 am    Post subject: My suggestion... Reply with quote

With commentary taken from the boards...

YT-1900 Transport
Craft: Corellian Engineering Corporation YT-1900 Transport
Affiliation: General
Era: Rebellion
Source: Arbitrary / Random-Marcus Starkiller
Type: Corellian Engineering Corporation YT-1900 Space Transport
Scale: Starfighter
Length: 26.2m
Skill: Space Transports - YT-1900
Crew: 1 (Gunners:1)
Crew Skill: varies
Passengers: 2
Consumables: 2 Months
Cargo Capacity: 30 Tons
Cost: 110,000 (new); 27,000 (used)
Hyperdrive Multiplier: X2
Hyperdrive Backup: X12
Nav Computer: Yes
Space: 6
Atmosphere: 700;1200kmh
Maneuverability: 2D
Hull: 4D
Shields: 0

Sensors:
Passive: 15/0D
Scan: 30/1D
Search: 50/2D
Focus: 2/3D

Weapons:
Laser Cannon
Fire Arc: Turret
Skill: Starship Gunnery
Fire Control: 2D
Space Range: 1-3/15/25
Atmosphere Range: 100-300/1.5/2.5km
Damage: 4D

Description: The YT-1900 is a later model from CEC, and is heavily based on the hugely successful YT-1300, with an off-center cockpit, cargo loading arms, and many other features familiar to those who have flown the YT-1300. Slightly bulkier, but with more powerful engines, the YT-1900 can carry larger cargoes, which are loaded through a forward mounted cargo hatch, leaving the lower ramps free for use by crew and passengers. However should the front hatch not be available, or useable, then the lower ramps can still be used as in other older designs. While opinions have been mainly positive about the YT-1900, the only major complaint has been about the turrets placement, since its field of fire is somewhat blocked by the large engine housings that run along the top of the vessel, but as with all turret placements the fire of fire always depends on good interaction between the pilot and gunner. As with previous YT series ships, the turret can be locked into a forwards firing position, and fired by the pilot if he is flying the ship solo. The YT-1900 has sold in good numbers and looks to be as big a success as the other YT freighters.
_________________
No matter where you go, there you are...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tetsuoh
Captain
Captain


Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Posts: 505

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if the text is to be taken as the design account for the ship - then the pic is wrong and the cockpit is probably WAY too large.

or the pics wrong and that description is laughable if its to be given to that actual pic. Or if the description is just a description not based on the ship's pic then it could be assumed that the ships stats are right and its a bigger ship than a 1300.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14171
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shootingwomprats wrote:
garhkal wrote:
Plus its size makes the internals look a lot smaller than a 1300 has, so where is all that extra coming from.


So make some suggestions? Easy to point out problems harder to make suggestions to fix them.

Quote:
Also, where is the turret? I don't even see one in the pic.


Well as we cannot see the bottom of the ship and game mechanically it doesn't matter, I would say the turret is on the bottom of the ship. As you pointed as you don't see one on the top or sides, so logically it has to be underneath =)


Fare enough. Here is my crack at it.
YT-1900 Transport
Craft: Corellian Engineering Corporation YT-1900 Transport
Affiliation: General
Era: Rebellion
Source: Arbitrary / Random-Marcus Starkiller
Type: Corellian Engineering Corporation YT-1900 Space Transport
Scale: Starfighter
Length: 26.2m
Skill: Space Transports - YT-1900
Crew: 1 (Gunners:1)
Crew Skill: varies
Passengers: 3
Consumables: 10 weeks
Cargo Capacity: 45 Tons
Cost: 110,000 (new); 27,000 (used)
Hyperdrive Multiplier: X2
Hyperdrive Backup: X12
Nav Computer: Yes
Space: 5
Atmosphere: 650;1100kmh
Maneuverability: 2D
Hull: 4D
Shields: 0

Sensors:
Passive: 15/0D
Scan: 30/1D
Search: 50/2D
Focus: 2/3D

Weapons:
Laser Cannon
Fire Arc: Turret (Ventrally mounted)
Skill: Starship Gunnery
Fire Control: 2D
Space Range: 1-3/15/25
Atmosphere Range: 100-300/1.5/2.5km
Damage: 4D
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0