View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14228 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:05 pm Post subject: Highligh, or Jai alai |
|
|
Over on wikipedia there is mention of this sport
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jai_alai which has clocked balls being thrown at over 300kmh.
A while back (14+ years), while watching some korean war documentaries, some soldiers used these baskets to lob grenades a LOT further than they would normally be able to go.
So if in a SW setting, someone had one of these, what range mods would be placed on grenades being tossed? What would the damage be from a ball slung into someone? Would it still be thrown weapons? _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CRMcNeill Director of Engineering
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Posts: 16326 Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:10 pm Post subject: Re: Highligh, or Jai alai |
|
|
garhkal wrote: | So if in a SW setting, someone had one of these, what range mods would be placed on grenades being tossed? |
Well, a properly wielded jai alai cestae can hurl a ball at around twice the speed that the fastest pro-baseball pitchers can manage. I don't know if the WEG rule of a maximum 10-meter range for throwing a grenade is accurate, but if I had to come up with a rule off the top of my head, I would say double the speed, double the range, so, 20 meters...
Quote: | What would the damage be from a ball slung into someone? Would it still be thrown weapons? |
Yes, it would still be Thrown Weapons, because you are still using a throwing action. As to the damage? Depends what you're throwing, and how hard you are throwing it... _________________ "No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.
The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bren Vice Admiral
Joined: 19 Aug 2010 Posts: 3868 Location: Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The principle is the same as that of the atl-atl. Increasing the lever arm, mutiplies the force so velocity and range increase. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14228 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So what would a good multiplier be? Looking in Gry's weapons book, we see most grenades have a 'thrown' range of 40m.. _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bren Vice Admiral
Joined: 19 Aug 2010 Posts: 3868 Location: Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know. Atlatl's in Runequest gave a bonus of Atlatl +1D6 to the damage of darts and javelins and +10m to effective range and +20m to max range. They did slow the ROF however to 1/round (about half the normal ROF).
Dart: 1D6 damage with a 20m effective / 30m max range
Javelin: 1D10 damage with a 20m effective / 50m max range
So the atlatl damage add was pretty significant. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 1846 Location: Tacoma, WA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:48 pm Post subject: Re: Highligh, or Jai alai |
|
|
crmcneill wrote: | I don't know if the WEG rule of a maximum 10-meter range for throwing a grenade is accurate, but if I had to come up with a rule off the top of my head, I would say double the speed, double the range, so, 20 meters... | I don't think it is accurate. Modern frag grenades can have 20 m lethal radii to un-armored standing targets, which would put a grenade "uncomfortable close" to the thrower... Besides, can you throw a fist-sized rock more than 33 feet? I sure can. I'd probably put grenades at a 20-30 meter max range, with a 2-3x boost for using a flinger of any kind.
crmcneill wrote: |
Quote: | What would the damage be from a ball slung into someone? Would it still be thrown weapons? |
Yes, it would still be Thrown Weapons, because you are still using a throwing action. As to the damage? Depends what you're throwing, and how hard you are throwing it... |
crmcneill wrote: | Well, a properly wielded jai alai cestae can hurl a ball at around twice the speed that the fastest pro-baseball pitchers can manage. | Energy=mass X velocity squared, so a doubling of velocity would yield a 4-fold increase in power. Roughly 2D. _________________ Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CRMcNeill Director of Engineering
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Posts: 16326 Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've always felt that throwing ranges should be based on the throwing character's strength. Maybe a base of 10 (as suggested by WEG), plus the character's Strength roll in meters? _________________ "No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.
The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 1846 Location: Tacoma, WA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
crmcneill wrote: | I've always felt that throwing ranges should be based on the throwing character's strength. Maybe a base of 10 (as suggested by WEG), plus the character's Strength roll in meters? |
That makes sense. It may still come up short, and it should also be affected by the projectile weight. _________________ Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CRMcNeill Director of Engineering
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Posts: 16326 Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fallon Kell wrote: | crmcneill wrote: | I've always felt that throwing ranges should be based on the throwing character's strength. Maybe a base of 10 (as suggested by WEG), plus the character's Strength roll in meters? |
That makes sense. It may still come up short, and it should also be affected by the projectile weight. |
Rather than the projectile weight, just use the WEG base range number as an indicator of the combined factors of weight and aerodynamics. _________________ "No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.
The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 1846 Location: Tacoma, WA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
crmcneill wrote: | Fallon Kell wrote: | crmcneill wrote: | I've always felt that throwing ranges should be based on the throwing character's strength. Maybe a base of 10 (as suggested by WEG), plus the character's Strength roll in meters? |
That makes sense. It may still come up short, and it should also be affected by the projectile weight. |
Rather than the projectile weight, just use the WEG base range number as an indicator of the combined factors of weight and aerodynamics. |
Well okay, but only if you can throw a bowling ball as far as you can throw a baseball... _________________ Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CRMcNeill Director of Engineering
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Posts: 16326 Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fallon Kell wrote: | crmcneill wrote: | Rather than the projectile weight, just use the WEG base range number as an indicator of the combined factors of weight and aerodynamics. |
Well okay, but only if you can throw a bowling ball as far as you can throw a baseball... |
I'm just pointing out that a thermal detonator is larger than a grenade, but it also can't be thrown as far. That being said, baring the possibility that I'm missing something, the WEG throwing range could be a good indicator of an object's aerodynamics and weight resistance when thrown. _________________ "No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.
The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naaman Vice Admiral
Joined: 29 Jul 2011 Posts: 3190
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
crmcneill wrote: | I've always felt that throwing ranges should be based on the throwing character's strength. Maybe a base of 10 (as suggested by WEG), plus the character's Strength roll in meters? |
I think the range should be more dependent upon the thrower's thrown weapons or grenade skill (respectively). A pro pitcher can throw a ball faster (and therefore farther) than a pro wrestler. Technique has a lot to do with how fast/far the object travels.
I do believe that strength plays a part (caber tossing, for example), just not as significant a part as skill. Unless you want to get really serious and factor in both strength and skill and mass and Cd of the object... I'd say, just allow an increase to the base range according to the number of dice the thrower has in the skill. Bonuses for slings/atlatls would stack, as well.
If you do want strength to play a part, I would recommend using strength as the limiting factor for what you can effectively use as a thrown weapon (even if it is improvised). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 1846 Location: Tacoma, WA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Naaman wrote: |
If you do want strength to play a part, I would recommend using strength as the limiting factor for what you can effectively use as a thrown weapon (even if it is improvised). |
Does this mean my AT-AT throwing tactic is out? _________________ Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naaman Vice Admiral
Joined: 29 Jul 2011 Posts: 3190
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say you'd need AT LEAST 3D+1 strength to be able to lift and throw an AT-AT. When you max out a 4D, you can manage a star destroyer as a thrown weapon, and if you spend a Force point, you can throw the death star. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 1846 Location: Tacoma, WA
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Naaman wrote: | I'd say you'd need AT LEAST 3D+1 strength to be able to lift and throw an AT-AT. When you max out a 4D, you can manage a star destroyer as a thrown weapon, and if you spend a Force point, you can throw the death star. | Time to save up for attribute improvements! _________________ Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|