| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 1:12 am Post subject: Imperial Tanker |
 |
|
Tempus in the Star Wars D6 Discord server posted an image of this ship and asked if there were stats for it. I was surprised to find out there were not, so I had create some. This is what I came up with. I did not play the PC game this appeared in, so input from others who did would be helpful
| Quote: | 
IMPERIAL TANKER
Craft: Kuat Drive Yards TTT-71 Tibanna Tanker Transport
Type: Tanker
Scale: Capital
Length: 150 meters
Skill: Space transports: TTT-71
Crew: 240; Skeleton 24/+5
Passengers: None
Cargo Capacity: 188,000 metric tons (fuel cylinder)
Consumables: 1 year
Cost: 2.25 million
Hyperdrive Multiplier: x3
Hyperdrive Backup: x15
Nav Computer: Yes
Maneuverability: 0D/1D*
Space: 3/5*
Atmosphere: 260; 750 kmh/ 350; 1,000 kmh*
Hull: 2D
Shields: 1D
Sensors:
-- Passive: 20/0D
-- Scan: 30/1D
-- Search: 40/1D+2
-- Focus: 1/2D
* stats when the ship is not hauling a fuel cylinder
Source: Stats by Emperor Ollie |
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter
Last edited by shootingwomprats on Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Whill
Dark Lord of the Jedi (Owner/Admin)
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 10435
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA, Earth, The Solar System, The Milky Way Galaxy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14213
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From what source, is that pic??
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| garhkal wrote: | | From what source, is that pic?? |
First image is from wookeepedia, the second from a Google search.
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fogger1138
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 25 Feb 2021
Posts: 104
Location: Maine
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| shootingwomprats wrote: | | garhkal wrote: | | From what source, is that pic?? |
First image is from wookeepedia, the second from a Google search. |
Looks like the work of unusualsuspex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14213
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
It may seem similar, but i don't see that pic there..
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sutehp
Commodore
Joined: 01 Nov 2016
Posts: 1797
Location: Washington, DC (AKA Inside the Beltway)
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fogger1138 wrote: | | shootingwomprats wrote: | | garhkal wrote: | | From what source, is that pic?? |
First image is from wookeepedia, the second from a Google search. |
Looks like the work of unusualsuspex. |
Fogger, you're right, the right side pic is indeed by unusualsuspex and can be found here. I love unusualsuspex, he does great work. His Star Trek ortho pics have been a godsend for my fanmade starship write-ups for Star Trek Adventures.
Hmm, this tanker is only 150 meters long? Damn, but they're dwarfed by Field Secured Container Vessels. Then again, the Empire would need smaller tankers rather than those gigantic things for smaller scale resupply missions. Re/re ops are not one size fits all, after all.
_________________
Sutehp's RPG Goodies
Only some of it is for D6 Star Wars.
Just repurchased the X-Wing and Tie Fighter flight sim games. I forgot how much I missed them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Forceally
Commodore
Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 1061
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Looking at the picture, it reminds me of the Darksaber rather than a fuel tanker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14213
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2022 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
It certainly looks like it doesn't have any fuel docking ports..
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mamatried
Commodore
Joined: 16 Dec 2017
Posts: 1861
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2022 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| is this length including the fuel tank, or is the fuel tank added to the length? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2022 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mamatried wrote: | | is this length including the fuel tank, or is the fuel tank added to the length? |
I did not originally design this ship, but I assumed from the text the tank was part of the ship, but it makes sense they are separate.
"Imperial tankers featured a long cylinder on the bow with a trapezoidal end piece housing the engines. The bridge was raised above a well-shielded engine pod, although the forward tank section was afforded less shielding."
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mamatried
Commodore
Joined: 16 Dec 2017
Posts: 1861
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2022 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| shootingwomprats wrote: | | Mamatried wrote: | | is this length including the fuel tank, or is the fuel tank added to the length? |
I did not originally design this ship, but I assumed from the text the tank was part of the ship, but it makes sense they are separate.
"Imperial tankers featured a long cylinder on the bow with a trapezoidal end piece housing the engines. The bridge was raised above a well-shielded engine pod, although the forward tank section was afforded less shielding." |
i found it most reasonable as well that they are seperate, given how the speed game note is worded, not saying when tank is empty or full, but when hauling the tank, making me feel they are seperate |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mamatried wrote: | | shootingwomprats wrote: | | Mamatried wrote: | | is this length including the fuel tank, or is the fuel tank added to the length? |
I did not originally design this ship, but I assumed from the text the tank was part of the ship, but it makes sense they are separate.
"Imperial tankers featured a long cylinder on the bow with a trapezoidal end piece housing the engines. The bridge was raised above a well-shielded engine pod, although the forward tank section was afforded less shielding." |
i found it most reasonable as well that they are seperate, given how the speed game note is worded, not saying when tank is empty or full, but when hauling the tank, making me feel they are seperate |
In hindsight I think I also came to that conclusion and that the length was the ship without tank.
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
