Are there any WEG stats of ships without shields?

[Sutehp]

As part of my research for Oliver Queen's Rogue One fanbook, I'm trying to find published WEG stats of ships without shields. I'm researching the U-wing and we'r including stats for the civilian version of the U-wing, also known as the BT-45D. According to the RO Visual Guide, the write-up says that "the BT-45D has been "stripped of all its offensive and defensive [emphasis mine] applications as well as its hyperdrive". Well, if its defensive capabilities have been removed, that must by definition mean that the BT-45D has no shields. (Yes, I find that odd that anyone would manufacture a starship with no defenses at all, but that's the only logical inference from this text. "Stripped of all defensive capabilities" can't mean anything else.)

So here's the big question: Does anyone in the Rancor Pit know of any official WEG-statted starship that has no shields?

I've already found an example of a ship without a hyperdrive/navcomp; that's the System Patrol Craft found in the Imperial Sourcebook on page 51. According to that precedent, ships without hyperdrives simply delete the entire stats lines for their Hyperdrive Multiplier, Hyperdrive Backup and Nav Comp lines. I'm just trying to double-check if deleting the Shields line in the BT-45D stats is the proper way to go, as opposed to just writing "Shields: None" or "Shields: No".
_________________
Sutehp's RPG Goodies
Only some of it is for D6 Star Wars.
Just repurchased the X-Wing and Tie Fighter flight sim games. I forgot how much I missed them.

[CRMcNeill]

TIE Fighters are the most prominent example, and there are plenty of low-end space transports that lack shields.

I'd take the Rogue One Visual Guide with a grain of salt, though. These are the same kooks who made the MC75 a converted building, and stripping out the hyperdrive really makes no sense.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index

[Sutehp]

[CRMcNeill]

Pirates & Privateers is a good official source. Anywhere from 25-33% of the ships listed in the Ships chapter don't have shields.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index

[Sutehp]

[Raven Redstar]

There are a couple of stock freighters that have high hull, no shields.

Z10 Seeker: Hull 3D, No Shields. (Stock Ships)
Incom X-23 StarWorker: Hull 3D, No Shields (Pirates and Privateers)
X-26 Starhaul: Hull 3D, No Shields (Pirates and Privateers)
Cuirilla-Raye Xylines-class Spacetug: Hull 3D, No Shields (Pirates and Privateers).
YT-1300: Hull 4D, No Shields (Core book).

That was just after a quick search.
_________________
RR
________________________________________________________________

[CRMcNeill]

[Whill]

[garhkal]

Let me do a look through the complete starships guide and get back with a full list.. Hazarding a guess, i'd say there's a good dozen to two dozen canon examples.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!

[CRMcNeill]

[Sutehp]

[Whill]

[Sutehp]

If everyone who posts is willing, I suppose I'd like as big a pattern as possible until I see an exception. But judging from the posts already made, it seems like I already have my answer: Ships without shields don't have a Shields stat.

It seems like I already have my sample size, but if people want to keep posting examples of ships without shields, I won't mind. If anyone finds a ship without shields that has a "Shields: No" or Shields: None" stat (or something similar) instead of it being deleted entirely, I'd be curious to see it.

I expect the pattern has already been established, though.
_________________
Sutehp's RPG Goodies
Only some of it is for D6 Star Wars.
Just repurchased the X-Wing and Tie Fighter flight sim games. I forgot how much I missed them.

[garhkal]

OK from The starship stats, revised and expanded (by Thiago S Aranha) i see
Starfighters
GENERAL
Sith Fighter – None
Sith Starfighter – None
Drake Starfighter – Yes (2d)
Cinnagar Interceptor – Yes (2d+2 with 2d backup)
Star Sabre – Yes (2d+1)
Stinger – Yes (2d)
C-73 Tracker – None
Dagger – None
Sigil Courier – Yes (1d)
Dianoga – Yes (1d)
Gun Tug – Yes (1d)
Cloakshape Fighter – None
Whitecloak Fighter – yes (0d+2)
Mercenary Fighter – Yes (1d+1 with 2d of back ups)
Phoenix Hawk Light Pinnace – Yes (2d)
TL-118 StarHammer – Yes (2d)
Naboo Police Cruiser – Yes (1d+1)
N-1 Royal Starfighter – Yes (1d)
G-1 Starfighter – Yes (1d+1)
Naboo Bomber – Yes (1d+1)
Freefall Bomber – Yes (1d)
Jedi Starfighter – Yes (1d)
Jedi Interceptor – None
V-19 Torrent – Yes (1d+1)
P-38 – Yes (1d+2)
T-36 Skyfighter – None (which is strange as it has ONLy 1d+1 hull)
Toscan 8-Q – None
Zebra – None
TIE-Y Ugly – None
Patrol StarSpeeder – None
PTR-3 Vedette – Yes (0d+2)
Hornet Interceptor – Yes (2d+2)
Authority IRD – No
Authority IRD-A – No
Pinook Fighter – Yes (1d)
Charon Starfighter – Yes (1d)
Z-95 Mark I Headhunter – Yes (1d)
Z-95 Headunter – Yes (1d)
Z-95XT Trainer - Yes (1d+2)
Gauntlet – Yes (1d)
Y-Wing – Yes (1d+2)
Y-TIE Ugly – Yes (1d+2)
Pursuer Enforcement Ship – Yes (1d)
Corsair Cruiser – Yes (1d)
StarViper – Yes (1d forward, 4d rear)
Vanguard Heavy Assault Gunship – Yes (2d)
Dagger-D Police Fighter – Yes (1d)
Qektoth Confederation Fighter – Yes (1d)
M3-A Scyk – Yes (1d)
G1-M4-C Dunelizard – Yes (1d)
M12 Kimogila – Yes (2d)
X-TIE Ugly – Yes (1d)
“Clutch” Ugly – Yes (1d+2)
Manta Assault Starfighter – Yes (2d+1)
R-41 Starchaser – Yes (2d+1)
Razor Fighter – Yes (1d)
Miy’til Fighter – Yes (1d+1)
Miy’til Assault Bomber – Yes (2d)
Planetary Fighter – Yes (2d)
Supa Fighter – Yes (1d+2)
Preybird Fighter – Yes (1d)
Ssi-ruuvi Battle Droid – Yes (1d+2)
Corellian B-Wing “Ugly” – Yes (2d)
LAF-250 – Yes (1d)
HLAF-250 – Yes (2d)
Blade-32 – None
Yevethan D-type Fighter – Yes (2d)
Clawcraft – Yes (1d+1)
Yorik-et Coralskipper – Yes (1d+2)

So out of 69 fighters here, we have only 14 without shields.

SEPARATIST
Droid Starfighter – No
Droid Bomber – No
Scarab – Yes (2d)
Advanced Droid Starfighter – No
Advanced Droid Bomber – No
Geonosian Starfighter – Yes (1d)
Geonosian Fanblade Starfighter – Yes (1d)
Mankvim-814 – Yes (1d)
Belbullab-22 – Yes (1d)
Tri-Fighter – No

So out of 10 fighters for the separatists, 5 have no shields.

IMPERIAL
V-Wing – Yes (1d)
ARC-170 – Yes (1d+2)
T.I.E. Starfighter – No
TIE Fighter – No
TIE Ground Targeting – No
TIE Reconnaissance – No
TIE Fire Control – No
TIE Advanced x1 – Yes (1d+1)
TIE Aggressor – Yes (1d+1)
Skypray Blastboat – Yes (2d)
TIE Interceptor – No
TIE Bomber – No
TIE Shuttle – No
TIE Vanguard – No
TIE Raptor – No
TIE Phantom – Yes (1d+2)
TIE Oppressor – Yes (1d+2)
Assault Gunboat – Yes (2d)
Missile Boat – Yes (1d+2)
Space Battle Droid – No
Scimitar Assault Bomber – Yes (1d+2)
TIE Advanced / Avenger – Yes (2d)
TIE Defender Prototype – No
TIE Defender – Yes (2d)
Super TIE/ln – No
TIE Droid – No
I-7 Howlrunner – Yes (1d+1)
Shadow Droid – Yes (2d)

So of 28 imperial fighters, 14 don't have shields..
And lastly...
ALLIANCE
X-Wing – Yes (1d)
Y-Wing Longprobe – Yes (1d)
A-Wing – Yes (1d)
B-Wing – Yes (2d)
Expanded B-Wing – Yes (2d+2)
T-Wing – Yes (1d+2)
H-Wing – Yes (2d)
A-9 Vigilance Interceptor – Yes (2d+2)
E-Wing – Yes (1d)
E-Wing: Type B – Yes (1d)
Reconnaissance X-Wing – Yes (1d)
T-65AC4 X-Wing – Yes (1d+2)
K-Wing Assault Bomber – Yes (2d)
Corellian Lancet – Yes (2d)
Defender – Yes (1d)
Cal Medium Starfighter – Yes (2d)
Starlancer Project Starship – 61
XJ X-Wing – Yes (1d)
XJ3 X-Wing – Yes (1d+2)

Of 19 alliance fighters, EVERYONE has shields..


I will get to freighters tomorrow..
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!

[Sutehp]

Damn, garhkal, this is truly above and beyond the call of duty. 8)
_________________
Sutehp's RPG Goodies
Only some of it is for D6 Star Wars.
Just repurchased the X-Wing and Tie Fighter flight sim games. I forgot how much I missed them.