View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Yubacore Cadet
Joined: 04 Aug 2014 Posts: 20 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 2:42 am Post subject: Initiative |
|
|
Dose anybody use different rules for initiative?
Would the game still work if it wasn't the "one side goes then the other" and it was changed to something more like the "normal" everyone roll then that is your place in-line to act? Then you could possibly have things like Delay Action instead of deciding if your side goes first or last. Anybody try this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xain Arke Line Captain
Joined: 19 Sep 2010 Posts: 989
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is how I've run initiative since my game group started playing WEG Star Wars, it's always worked fine for us.
Xain |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klhaviation Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 19 Aug 2014 Posts: 188
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
1st edition dose not use init. All actions are considered essentially simultaneous. If it matters... for instance if a stormtrooper and Rebel fire at each other.... The higher blaster roll fires first.
This system really keeps the game moving. 1st edition Rules Companions expanded a lot, adding more steps in each round... thins like "haste" and order mattered more. It works more like a traditional game. Not my preference, but very functional. 2nd ed re uses the simple Perception roll. D6 Space is Probably the most complicated.
It really doesn't matter though... what ever style you like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evilnerf Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 11 Apr 2015 Posts: 165 Location: St. Charles
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use a more D20 like initiative in my game. The players go in initiative in the order they rolled and they can take as many actions they want during their turns (with the Multi-Action penalty applied).
Works pretty darn well, if I do say so. _________________ His eyes are shifty. That's how you know the nerf did it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shootingwomprats Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Sep 2013 Posts: 2690 Location: Online
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have each player and important npc, and roll for groups of minions. _________________ Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yubacore Cadet
Joined: 04 Aug 2014 Posts: 20 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I have each player and important npc, and roll for groups of minions. |
Quote: | I use a more D20 like initiative in my game. The players go in initiative in the order they rolled and they can take as many actions they want during their turns (with the Multi-Action penalty applied). |
Interesting. The way shootingwhomprats dose it seems like a good mid-ground. Do you guys keep to the rule "first actions on one side, then first on the other, then next round, second actions"? Or if a player declares 3 actions dose he resolve all of those actions on his turn (with the die penality of course)?
Quote: | 1st edition dose not use init. All actions are considered essentially simultaneous. |
I had no idea 1st edition had different init. rules. I know that in the Miniatures Battles rules by WEG they had a cool set of turn rules that essentially simulated simultaneous action. Damage is not applied nor take effect till the end of the round, kinda cool.
Thanks everybody! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evilnerf Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 11 Apr 2015 Posts: 165 Location: St. Charles
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Interesting. The way shootingwhomprats dose it seems like a good mid-ground. Do you guys keep to the rule "first actions on one side, then first on the other, then next round, second actions"? Or if a player declares 3 actions dose he resolve all of those actions on his turn (with the die penality of course)? |
I don't. I tried this for a bit, but it was just too hard to keep track of. There is also the issue of players not necessarily knowing how many actions they want to take when the round begins.
If you do it my way, the player knows how many actions and does them. If they dodged between their last turn and this one, they take the penalities on their actions for this round.
I also, hate, hate, hate, having to roll initiative every round, which is required if you do it the way that's int he book. _________________ His eyes are shifty. That's how you know the nerf did it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Leon The Lion Commander
Joined: 29 Oct 2009 Posts: 309 Location: Somewhere in Poland
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How I do it:
Everybody rolls for initiative every round (possibly groups of identical mooks get a single initiative roll for all; also, a commander may confer his own initiative to his entire command, but must pass a Command roll to do so).
Each round has 5 "initiative passes", In each pass, everybody may perform one action, in order of initiative (MAPs get assigned progressively instead of all at once).
Once all five passes are over, a new round begins, with a new initiative roll.
I am a little ambivalent on rolling initiative each round. On one hand, it is time consuming and somewhat tedious. On the other hand, I love how unpredictable, dynamic, and cinematic it makes combat, keeping everybody on their toes, because you never know when somebody may get a really good or bad initiative roll, changing the entire tactical situation in a heartbeat. _________________ Plagiarize! Let no one else's work evade your eyes,
Remember why the good Lord made your eyes! So don't shade your eyes,
But plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize... Only be sure to call it, please, "research".
- Tom Lehrer |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CRMcNeill Director of Engineering
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Posts: 16281 Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's interesting to note that, at least for the QuickDraw rules, WEG reverted to the 1E method by basing initiative on a dice pool of the Blaster skill. There likely are other gaming scenarios where the 1E rule be more efficient and realistic, as well... _________________ "No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.
The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
shootingwomprats Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Sep 2013 Posts: 2690 Location: Online
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote=Yubacore]Interesting. The way shootingwhomprats dose it seems like a good mid-ground. Do you guys keep to the rule "first actions on one side, then first on the other, then next round, second actions"? Or if a player declares 3 actions dose he resolve all of those actions on his turn (with the die penality of course)?[/quote]
I also forgot to mention that I roll initiative once per side for the entire counter. The only time I roll initiative is if: 1. another group enters the fight, 2. conditions change (earthquake, flood, etc), or 3. a character or groups resets their initiative.
Resetting initiative requires the character or group does nothing else that round while it assesses the situation or organizes people and assets. At the beginning of the next round they may re-roll their initiative.
So they way I do it, all important characters and groups roll one time for the entire scene. I do use the 1st action, 2nd action, and so on, moving down the initiative order.
I have toyed with doing away with the 1st action, 2nd action, etc, and have the player roll all their actions with MAP. If they decide to dodge it happens after they have performed all their skill rolls and is assessed a further -1D penalty. The only real downside to this, they do not have the option to burn the rest of their action in the round and perform a reactive defense at no further die penalty.
For example, the character declares two actions, his first action is to shoot his blaster at the pirate. The pirate returns fire. Now the character has two choices .He can declare a reactive action, treating it as an instant 3rd action and thus rolling his defense roll at -2D, but when it comes to his end action, instead of -1D it will be -2D. His other choice is to burn his 2nd action and perform the reactive defense at -1D, the original map for two actions.
So you can see, by letting the players do all their actions then dealing with possible defenses gives them fewer options. On the upside it would streamline things.
evilnerf wrote: | I also, hate, hate, hate, having to roll initiative every round, which is required if you do it the way that's int he book. |
I had not noticed that before. But then again, your only rolling initiative to see which side goes first, the order on the side never changes as its in Perception order. So two groups face off, you make two initiative rolls each round. _________________ Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yubacore Cadet
Joined: 04 Aug 2014 Posts: 20 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I don't. I tried this for a bit, but it was just too hard to keep track of. There is also the issue of players not necessarily knowing how many actions they want to take when the round begins. |
Good lord, man! do you keep track of that all yourself? I make this the players' responsibility because you're right, it can get complicated quick. If everybody takes charge of keeping track of their actions, current dodge, and penalties, it's not so bad. If one of my players stalls for more than 2 min. deciding how many actions he's going to take I say, "you've been caught off guard, turn lost. who's next?" Joking, I don't do that. would keep them on their toes though.
Quote: | If you do it my way, the player knows how many actions and does them. If they dodged between their last turn and this one, they take the penalities on their actions for this round. |
So, how many times can they dodge per round?
Leon: I like it, worth a try.
crmcneill: I hadn't realized that about the quickdraw rules. I always used it as a 'you want to try to seize top init.' type rule.
Quote: | I have toyed with doing away with the 1st action, 2nd action, etc, and have the player roll all their actions with MAP. If they decide to dodge it happens after they have performed all their skill rolls and is assessed a further -1D penalty. The only real downside to this, they do not have the option to burn the rest of their action in the round and perform a reactive defense at no further die penalty. |
That's really what i've been wondering. It seems like there would be a bit of a loss of game if you played it like that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evilnerf Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 11 Apr 2015 Posts: 165 Location: St. Charles
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yubacore wrote: |
Good lord, man! do you keep track of that all yourself? I make this the players' responsibility because you're right, it can get complicated quick. If everybody takes charge of keeping track of their actions, current dodge, and penalties, it's not so bad. If one of my players stalls for more than 2 min. deciding how many actions he's going to take I say, "you've been caught off guard, turn lost. who's next?" Joking, I don't do that. would keep them on their toes though. |
I mean, sure they COULD figure it out. But who wants to waste that much time figuring out who goes first? Get to the shooting, I always say.
Quote: | So, how many times can they dodge per round?
|
As far as I can tell, there is no limit. _________________ His eyes are shifty. That's how you know the nerf did it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yubacore Cadet
Joined: 04 Aug 2014 Posts: 20 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Get to the shooting, I always say. |
(thumbs up) Can't argue with that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14168 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In Sparks we do the "Group roll, based on highest perception score makes the roll for his side" way..
In my home games i have done some where it was everyone rolls their OWN initiative score (perception) and acted in that order, much like individual initiative in ADND.. While in other home games i did it just like the book, where its one side then the other..
Some players much preferred the individual system, while others preferred the group method. _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14168 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bringing this back up to ask a question..
When you DO use the "highest per in the group rolls" initiative way, what happens IF both the PC group and the enemy roll the same for initiative?? Do you have a tie breaker roll off? Use something else to 'break the tie'?
Or do you have everything go simultaneously? _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|