View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
CmdrDarmic Cadet
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Conroe, TX (N. of Houston)
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:31 pm Post subject: Using the Force |
|
|
So, how do you handle the Force in your game?
The groups I have played in have used a decidedly cinematic approach. What I mean by that is, we allowed Force powers to be used as a reaction to someone else's actions. For example: a stormtrooper shoots at the Jedi, and the Jedi rolls against absorb/dissapate energy power to avoid the damage.
If I understand the 'rules as written', this is not how things work. In the example given, the Jedi would only get to roll against his power if he had that power 'up' at the time he was struck by the blaster bolt.
So, how do you handle Force use? I am of the opinion that the cinematic option is the way to go. This is Star Wars, after all. What do you think? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ankhanu Vice Admiral
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 3089 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use a mixture of the rules as written and your cinematic style... as appropriate to the situation. For the most part, it's rules as written (or house rules as written), but there are situations where a reactive use could come into play; for example, I'll use the trooper shooting the Jedi you gave, if the Jedi knows the attack is coming and it would make sense in terms of initiative, I'd allow a reactive Control/Absorb Energy or something; if the Jedi was not aware of the incoming attack and/or they'd already messed themselves up for actions in initiative, they would probably be taken by surprise and not get the reflexive action.
Generally the story is more important than the mechanic in our games... but that's tempered with a healthy respect for the mechanic. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14168 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, the Ab/Dis skill can be used as a reaction, to somehting going on. It's only when using it for absorbing things like solar radiation etc, you 'keep it up'.
Let me look tomorrow for the rule on it.. _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CmdrDarmic Cadet
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Conroe, TX (N. of Houston)
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK, that was a poor example, but you get the idea. In general, do you allow Force powers to be used as a reaction?
The second part of the question is this: When activating (and maintaining) a Force power that uses more than one of control, sense and alter, do you count it as a single skill use, or do you count it as multiple actions? We have used the rule that, no matter how many Force abilities are involved (and how many die rolls are made), it is a single action to activate (and to maintain), say, affect mind (or any other multiple Force ability powers).
This has worked well for us in the past, but I would like to hear what others have experienced/think. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ankhanu Vice Admiral
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 3089 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The official rule is multiple uses. We initially did it that way, but switched to single use years back. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gry Sarth Jedi
Joined: 25 May 2004 Posts: 5304 Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We handle the Force pretty much by the book. The only addition are some fan-made powers. _________________ "He's Gry Sarth, of course he has the stats for them." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14168 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ankhanu wrote: | The official rule is multiple uses. We initially did it that way, but switched to single use years back. |
Agreed that it is btb to count all skills for Force powers being kept up, but as a question, why did you switch to single 'd' off regardless of whether it was a single, double or triple force skill?? _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ankhanu Vice Admiral
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 3089 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mostly due to laziness. But also, perhaps, because our Jedi were always so low level that to do otherwise generally meant that they were either very weak (Force would generally fail), or would probably die due to MAPs (Or taking too many rounds to even prepare).
Last edited by Ankhanu on Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:46 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Grimace Captain
Joined: 11 Oct 2004 Posts: 729 Location: Montana; Big Sky Country
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I generally do a more "cinematic" sort of running of the Force. One "action" even if it uses Control, Sense and Alter to activate the power, and some powers I allow the player to roll for if they think of it in time. Basically, I do what seems to best capture the feel and tempo of the movies when it comes to the Force. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CmdrDarmic Cadet
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Conroe, TX (N. of Houston)
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We made the change based on the previously mentioned affect mind power. This power is generally one that needs to be used quickly. I mean, how much time does OB1 have to prepare to use the power all of those times we see him use it? Usually he needs to use it right now, and taking three rounds to ramp up the power just is not feasable.
Also, all that preparing to do stuff just is not very cinematic, as Grimace pointed out. It is more in keeping with the style of game I personally enjoy to keep things a little 'looser and easier', as one friend put it.
Granted, that is only one way to play the game, and ymmv. As always, it is whatever makes the game more enjoyable for you and your fellow players. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14168 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ankhanu wrote: | But also, perhaps, because our Jedi were always so low level that to do otherwise generally meant that they were either very weak (Force would generally fail), or would probably die due to MAPs (Or taking too many rounds to even prepare). |
Is that not the 'quandry' of any low level (skill dice) character... Where your skill is so low you could not try lots of stuff, unless it was easy, due to maps etc..
As to me, it is one action per skill needed to activate the power. So a jedi MIGHT get "interrupted" bringing up LS combat, if he gets incaped after bringing up the first skill.. _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ankhanu Vice Admiral
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 3089 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, it is, but, in our games anyway, the Jedi were almost always seriously gimped compared to the other equally leveled characters, this balanced things out a little bit and, more importantly, kept the game moving along. I kind of find separating slows the action down somewhat. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott2978 Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 02 Jun 2005 Posts: 220 Location: Arizona, USA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CmdrDarmic wrote: | We made the change based on the previously mentioned affect mind power. This power is generally one that needs to be used quickly. I mean, how much time does OB1 have to prepare to use the power all of those times we see him use it? Usually he needs to use it right now, and taking three rounds to ramp up the power just is not feasable. |
I disagree that OB1 didn't know ahead of time that he was going to use Affect Mind. The 2 uses I can think of, in Mos Eisely on the Stormtroopers and on the Death Star tractor beam catwalk, he had ample time to prepare. Luke probly saw the Stormtrooper blockade a long way off, and OB1 probly knew he might have to use AM to get past some imps on the Death Star and had it prepared.
But the real clincher is this: remember that in SWRE:2E one "round" is any amount of time that you feel is apropriate as the GM. It says right in the rule book that you should take artistic license with exactly how long one round is. So, maybe you're bringin up all three skills in 3 consecutive 1 second long rounds!
As for the OP's topic, I use a different method depending on what timeline the game is in. for GCW time, I want the life of a Jedi wannabe to be really tough. No trainers, no holocrons, no silly stuff. The Jedi are gone. Yoda, Ben, and eventually Luke, that's it. So a Jedi PC in the GCW timeline has to use one action for each skill. But in a game set during prequal times, I'd allow a "one die" method, due to the more prolific natuer of Force knowledge, and the more prolific nature of Force using enemies.
Scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ankhanu Vice Admiral
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 3089 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scott2978 wrote: |
As for the OP's topic, I use a different method depending on what timeline the game is in. for GCW time, I want the life of a Jedi wannabe to be really tough. No trainers, no holocrons, no silly stuff. The Jedi are gone. Yoda, Ben, and eventually Luke, that's it. So a Jedi PC in the GCW timeline has to use one action for each skill. But in a game set during prequal times, I'd allow a "one die" method, due to the more prolific natuer of Force knowledge, and the more prolific nature of Force using enemies.
Scott |
Interesting idea, I like it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CmdrDarmic Cadet
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Conroe, TX (N. of Houston)
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scott2978 wrote: | I disagree that OB1 didn't know ahead of time that he was going to use Affect Mind. The 2 uses I can think of, in Mos Eisely on the Stormtroopers and on the Death Star tractor beam catwalk, he had ample time to prepare. Luke probly saw the Stormtrooper blockade a long way off, and OB1 probly knew he might have to use AM to get past some imps on the Death Star and had it prepared. |
Granted, he may have seen the first one coming, but he uses the power four times in rapid succession with no chance to use the slow-but-sure, one-skill-per-round method on the follow-up uses. Then again OB1 probably has enough skill dice not to worry about a few MAPs.
scott2978 wrote: | But the real clincher is this: remember that in SWRE:2E one "round" is any amount of time that you feel is apropriate as the GM. It says right in the rule book that you should take artistic license with exactly how long one round is. So, maybe you're bringin up all three skills in 3 consecutive 1 second long rounds! |
Which is, in effect, what we are doing by allowing all of the skills to be used in a single round with no MAPs. The mechanics are different, but the effect is identical.
scott2978 wrote: | I use a different method depending on what timeline the game is in. for GCW time, I want the life of a Jedi wannabe to be really tough. No trainers, no holocrons, no silly stuff. The Jedi are gone. Yoda, Ben, and eventually Luke, that's it. So a Jedi PC in the GCW timeline has to use one action for each skill. But in a game set during prequal times, I'd allow a "one die" method, due to the more prolific natuer of Force knowledge, and the more prolific nature of Force using enemies. |
An interesting approach, but tell me: Has the Force changed during this time frame? As the Force is constant, it must be the Force users that are the source of the difficulties. Will the Force users always suffer this penalty, or will there come a time when they are more familiar/comfortable with the Force and can begin using it in the more familiar/comfortable way?
Don't get me wrong, the approach is valid and I like it. I just wonder what the overall justification is and what kind of mechanics you are using to represent the changes.
BTW, what does GCW stand for? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|