| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DougRed4
Rear Admiral
Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Posts: 2272
Location: Seattle, WA
|
 Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 4:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
I'm pretty impressed with what you've been able to put together, Fallon Kell!
_________________
Currently Running: Villains & Vigilantes (a 32-year-old campaign with multiple groups) and D6 Star Wars; mostly on hiatus are Adventures in Middle-earth and Delta Green |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DirkCorman
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 111
|
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I like it very much as well! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell
Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: Tacoma, WA
|
| Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DirkCorman wrote: | The two bits on the front of the ship, under the cockpit are the sensors.
Could this be refined into a sensor bar of sorts? |
Probably. Can you be a little more specific in regards to what a "sensor bar" is/looks like? I could put a linear phased array antenna running between the sensors.
_________________
Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirkCorman
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 111
|
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i would liken it to that pulsing light on the front of KITT in Knight Rider..
But without too much of the light inside. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell
Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: Tacoma, WA
|
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
How's this?
The version of Sketchup I'm using has practically zero lighting tools, so I left it unlit. If you want a red glow or something, you may have to photoshop it in.
_________________
Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirkCorman
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 111
|
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sir..
I tip my hat to you.. It is perfect!
Thank you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell
Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: Tacoma, WA
|
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sure thing. 
_________________
Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirkCorman
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 111
|
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The missile launchers look good too |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell
Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: Tacoma, WA
|
| Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
So what changes have been made to the other TIE?
_________________
Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirkCorman
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 111
|
| Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The missile launcher holds 4 missiles.. so that can be shown.
The rest is fine |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell
Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: Tacoma, WA
|
| Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DirkCorman wrote: | | The missile launcher holds 4 missiles.. so that can be shown. |
Holds 4 missiles or has 4 launch apertures?
_________________
Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell
Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: Tacoma, WA
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here it is depicted as holding 4 missiles.
_________________
Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirkCorman
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 111
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 4 launch apertures perhaps? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallon Kell
Commodore
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: Tacoma, WA
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay. I kinda like the open rack, though. Are these apertures for different kinds of warheads? We could have them all launch through the bottom, and have the launch racks simply replenished by the magazines, if you're not opposed.
How's the rest of the thing look? The overhead fuselage all good and such?
_________________
Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier
Complete Starship Construction System |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirkCorman
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 111
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no, I like that idea, although it is a maximum of 4 missiles.
Either 4 of the particle missiles or 4 of the small protons can be installed at one time.
The rest looks good! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
