View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14213 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 3:55 pm Post subject: land speeders underwater. |
|
|
Lets say someone is piloting one of those enclosed landspeeders (like the luxury one from galadiniums), but while fleeing over water, gets ionized and goes in the drink. How far down can it go before starting to worry about crushing? Will it leak?
Since it was just ionized, after power comes back on, what roll will be needed to get it out of the water??? _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gry Sarth Jedi
Joined: 25 May 2004 Posts: 5304 Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Standard Landspeeders are not meant to work underwater (and most can't even fly over it). I don't think they would fare any better than our cars if sinking underwater. Speeders are not vacuum sealed and would start filling with water in that nice suspenseful way, so pressure crushing would not be really a problem, as it would probably be filled with water way before sinking to crushing depths. And I don't think you would be able to fly a landspeeder out of the water after it has sunk, that's what submergibles and waterspeeders are for. _________________ "He's Gry Sarth, of course he has the stats for them." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ankhanu Vice Admiral
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 3089 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gry Sarth wrote: | Standard Landspeeders are not meant to work underwater (and most can't even fly over it). I don't think they would fare any better than our cars if sinking underwater. Speeders are not vacuum sealed and would start filling with water in that nice suspenseful way, so pressure crushing would not be really a problem, as it would probably be filled with water way before sinking to crushing depths. And I don't think you would be able to fly a landspeeder out of the water after it has sunk, that's what submergibles and waterspeeders are for. |
that's my take on it too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phalanks Balas Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 05 Jul 2005 Posts: 176 Location: Paris - France
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, a landspeeder is a car without wheels. when a landspeeder run over water, same thing occurs than if you run your car in a lake... _________________ Phalanks
A day you will be facing the guns of the Black Pearl. You will know what means damned pirates ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tupteq Commander
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 285 Location: Rzeszów, Poland
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see a problem here. What if landpeeder has altitude range ~10m (not so rare)? Should it count from lake bottom (then if depth <10m there's no problem)? If so, what will happen with water between landspeeder and bottom? Maybe repulsorlift engines may affect water somehow (for example pushing it and creating Moses-like effect )? If so, then maybe it's possible to slide over the water using surface tension of water (like on surfboard, but with repulsor field used as plane)? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ankhanu Vice Admiral
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 3089 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
While it makes sense logically, it doesn't really fit with the technology presented in the SW universe. There are floating vehicles for a range of uses, landspeeders, airspeeders, speeder boats, etc that all use the same technology but do not work in the same situations (terrain). Though it would seem logical that a landspeeder might skip over the surface of water or operate against the bottom of the water, it doesn't work flavour-wise. Landspeeder hits water and it sinks... same sort of reason why the repulsors on Luke's X-Wing were useless getting it out of the swamp on Daggobah. Logically they'd still work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray Commodore
Joined: 31 Oct 2003 Posts: 1743 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, North America, Western Hemisphere, Earth, Sol, Western Arm, Milky Way
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
My group has always used that if it has any great amount of altitude (More than 20 metres, say), it could go over anything save an ocean unless things were choppy.
If less, then it could go over shallow, still water, and have a really cool wave effect while doing it.
Needless to say, pedestrians get splashed a lot when it rains in the Star Wars Universe.
IIRC, we've never seen an ocean-going Speeder, as Boats are effective in that manner. We have been underwater a number of times, but in tunnels.
In fact, we've had *NO* luck when it comes to boats. Almost all the ones we've been on have sank.
OK, we did the sinking a few times, but that's a different matter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14213 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some of the land speeders i have read, DO list them as being able to go over water, but do add a diff to the repulsor roll if the waves are choppy.. _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orgaloth Vice Admiral
Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 3754 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd base it on the scene in back to the future 2 where Marty Mcfly takes the hover board on the lake. Biff says something about needing propulsion to work on water. I know its not SW, but I think it gives an idea on how it works. _________________ "I take orders from just one person: Me!"
"You know, sometimes I amaze even myself."
Du Cass' Dream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hellcat Grand Moff
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 11921 Location: New England
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phalanks Balas wrote: | Well, a landspeeder is a car without wheels. when a landspeeder run over water, same thing occurs than if you run your car in a lake... |
Actually, since a landspeeder appears to use some form of repulsorlift to hover above the terrain over which it travels, I'd say it could travel over water though it would be more akin to a car traveling over ruts in a road. Perhaps far worse as waves, eddies, or wakes could swamp the landspeeder or send it out of control. Or worse, send it airborn well above it's altitude range and come crashing down.
As for crush depths, since most landspeeders aren't designed to operate it the water, they wouldn't have a pressure hull so they'd crush at a either a much shallower depth than say SS-1 USS Holland or at about the same depth. The Holland wasn't supposed to opperate below a hundred feet, though I have no clue what her actual crush depth would have been. However, as Gry pointed out you wouldn't be too worried about crush depth unless you could breath underwater. Drowning would be the bigger problem and so would being able to get out of the sinking landspeeder before having to worry about drowning. You'd have to wait for the pressure inside to be equal to the pressure outside unless you could somehow break out. _________________ FLUFFY for President!!!!
Wanted Poster |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PsiberDragon Commander
Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 260
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My basic thought on landspeeders is more of a VTOL type vehicle on a small, very controlled scale.
So, while you could go over a shallow creek or stream... a river, pond, lake, ocean, etc that has a deeper bottom wouldn't be able to support the craft as the surface tension of the water is insufficient to provide the proper lift... _________________ "Love like you will die tomorrow. Hate like you will live forever." - Unknown |
|
Back to top |
|
|
masque Captain
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 626 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm back after a week out of town.
PsiberDragon wrote: | My basic thought on landspeeders is more of a VTOL type vehicle on a small, very controlled scale.
So, while you could go over a shallow creek or stream... a river, pond, lake, ocean, etc that has a deeper bottom wouldn't be able to support the craft as the surface tension of the water is insufficient to provide the proper lift... |
I agree with Psiber, here. _________________ Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ifurin Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 May 2007 Posts: 208
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i read somewhere (don't remember where) that repulsor lift tech worked by "pushing" against the gravity of a planet. thats why they don't work in space and asteroid belts. if that is so then what reason would they work differently over water? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Endwyn Commander
Joined: 22 Jul 2005 Posts: 481
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basically, it comes down to surface tension. While repulsor lift tech is based on anti-gravity it exerts a strong gravimetric force that has to push against the planet's gravity to keep it above the ground. (The ground being the solid object that the repulsor is actually pushing against the gravity of.) When it hits water it would attempt to do this same thing, but the water (being a non-solid state) will react to the change in gravity and part; which in turn would cause the vehicle to continuously loose it's already limited altitude (of around 1-2 meters) until it was lower in altitude than the water ahead of it which would cause a wake collision.
This could be avoided for a limited time if the speeder had acquired enough speed to avoid breaking surface tension initially and continued to gain/increase speed faster than the water reacted to the changes in gravity or if the user had made modifications to the repulsor system to extend the gravity field out over more surface area to reduce the effects it has on non-solid surfaces. Both of these modifications are unlikely to resolve all problems you might encounter over water but will reduce your difficulties in trying to cross it.
There are other vehicles in Star Wars that use repulsor technologies that fly at higher altitudes that would experience little to no problem due to the differences in distance and overall power level of the equipment. (This equipment actually pushes against the planet's gravity in general not the gravity of surface objects.) _________________ Luke, I am your father.
That's impossible!
And Leia is your sister!
That's improbable?
And the Empire will be destroyed by..EWOKS!
That's...highly unlikely.
The Force? Bacteria called midichlorians.
If you don’t take this seriously I'm out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gry Sarth Jedi
Joined: 25 May 2004 Posts: 5304 Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's tricky to discuss repulsorlift technology in real physics terms, cause it really wasn't meant to have much logic. The speeders float, that's it. The explanation of "pushing against gravity" shouldn't be scrutinized too much. If we assume that the ship is pushing the surface in order to float (and thus would sink in water because of surface tension), then it would be possible for a person to be "runned over" by a speeder flying overhead. The logic is that the person on the ground would effectively be part of the surface, and would have to sustain the vehicle's weight when it flew overhead (it's not healthy to stand underneath a Harrier Jet lifting off). This is clearly not the case, so we have to accept that repulsorlift techonolgy doesn't work quite how it should in real-world physics.
I base my opinion on how well a speeder would fare over water by the fact that there are "waterspeeders", such as the TIE Boat or Waveskimmer. If normal speeders could fly over water, then there wouldn't be a need for these specialized speeders. _________________ "He's Gry Sarth, of course he has the stats for them." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|