View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Whill Dark Lord of the Jedi (Owner/Admin)
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Posts: 10406 Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA, Earth, The Solar System, The Milky Way Galaxy
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bulldogzeta wrote: | garhkal wrote: | Bulldogzeta wrote: | Another area of flexiblity is template skills. If the player has a logical reason for a skill that's not on the template, I will allow it as long as most of the skill dice are placed in template skills. In the end, I consider character concept more important than the template.
|
When you do that, is there an upper limit to how many 'additional skills' that can be argued should be part of the character? |
I don't use a hard number, but I don't think I'd allow more than 2 dice going into skills not on the template. Depends on the character concept. |
And there are those of us GMs who don't even have template skills. Instead, I have a rule stating every single skill die allocation has to be explainable by the character's background. The only exception is that I'll let any PC have its first 1D in Dodge without explanation - call it natural ability or luck. Beyond that, I have no qualms in vetoing any skill die allocation that doesn't jive with the character's background. _________________ *
Site Map
Forum Guidelines
Registration/Log-In Help
The Rancor Pit Library
Star Wars D6 Damage |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14173 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So if they already know "all the skills their backround" would indicate, what goal(s) are there to work towards in regards to new skills? _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Whill Dark Lord of the Jedi (Owner/Admin)
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Posts: 10406 Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA, Earth, The Solar System, The Milky Way Galaxy
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They don't necessarily know all the skills their background would indicate. The idea is that they can't know things that their background couldn't explain.
Your PC has never been off your home planet before the start of the campaign? He can't have the Space Transports skill... Your PC has been an accountant on Alderaan since graduating from Aldera Business School? How did he learn 1D in survival, and 1D in Blaster with a specialty die in blaster rifle on top of that? Oh, growing up he spent every summer with his cousins sharpshooting, camping, tracking and hunting in his rich uncle's private hunting preserve on Rodia? That works.
The idea is that the player has to put effort and thought into making the descriptive character background support his choices for skill allocation.
In my game, PCs can still advance new skills that they don't start with, just like in RAW. Their skill advancement goals are based on what skills they want their character to be better at. _________________ *
Site Map
Forum Guidelines
Registration/Log-In Help
The Rancor Pit Library
Star Wars D6 Damage |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Edheldun Cadet
Joined: 05 Nov 2013 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the input everyone. My group is comprised of pretty novice players, and our GM last semester struggled with knowing how to move beyond DnD style power gaming and "kick in the door blasters firing" style play. We took a session before we started to talk through the characters people wanted to play and they've all responded pretty well.
As far as the cybernetic arm goes, I talked about it with the player and decided it wasn't totally unreasonable. It tacked on a few thousand more to the debt they owed on their space ship to cover the cost. He has also had to spend a lot of his time making sneak checks to make sure no one notices the enhancement and create a stir with the law. He also takes a dexterity penalty any time he tries to do something that normally takes two hands and can't use it with a space suit on.
I understand and agree with discouraging the players from getting too attached to equipment. In this instance though, the player treats it as an extension of himself, like natural armor or claws. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
garhkal Sovereign Protector
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 14173 Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it just a replacement arm, or an augmentative arm? _________________ Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DougRed4 Rear Admiral
Joined: 18 Jan 2013 Posts: 2272 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think that's quite reasonable, Edheldun. Having some sort of artificial/synthetic arm is very 'Star Wars'. _________________ Currently Running: Villains & Vigilantes (a 32-year-old campaign with multiple groups) and D6 Star Wars; mostly on hiatus are Adventures in Middle-earth and Delta Green |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bulldogzeta Sub-Lieutenant
Joined: 08 Jan 2009 Posts: 56 Location: Fox Valley, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whill wrote: |
And there are those of us GMs who don't even have template skills. Instead, I have a rule stating every single skill die allocation has to be explainable by the character's background. The only exception is that I'll let any PC have its first 1D in Dodge without explanation - call it natural ability or luck. Beyond that, I have no qualms in vetoing any skill die allocation that doesn't jive with the character's background. |
That's an interesting idea. With my players I'm sure I would get some good back-stories, but I would need to give them adequate time to develop their characters. I would still likely have them pick a template for inspiration purposes if nothing else. Even then I might not insist that every single skill be explained. Anything having over 3D or anything unusual (like zero-G maneuvering) being explained would be good enough for me.
I'll have to try this someday. _________________ Never tell me the odds! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Barrataria Commander
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 295 Location: Republic of California
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I basically agree with what Whill and Garkhal have said, but I'll add that I think that in a game as free-wheeling as SW, with almost limitless character race possibilities, I think templates are a very useful starting point for chargen.
That's particularly true with new players; most of them don't have a fixed character idea in mind, so I like to give them 5 or so templates to pick from. Actually, I'll give each new player a pile of 5 (appropriate to the campaign and to the player if I know them well) to pick from, and suggest that if they don't like any they can trade their pile to another player.
Swapping out this or that feature (particularly changing race) is fine in general, but I'd look askance at cybernetics or custom race abilities. _________________ "A special effect without a story is a pretty boring thing"- George Lucas |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|