The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

come over the the dark side we have cookies.
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Gamemasters -> come over the the dark side we have cookies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tinman
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Posts: 110

PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can say for certain that any player who wanted their character to start out with one or more Dark Side Points, especially if I thought they were trying to take advantage of the associated dice bonus (Second Edition Expanded and Revised, 141) would receive a GREAT deal of scrutiny in terms of their characters' actions whenever using Force abilities, and be well warned of the possible consequences (i.e. that they would be losing their character if they fell, and would not get the chance to play Darth-whatever.)

Non-Force Sensitive characters with Dark Side Points, on the other hand, is an interesting matter. Such a character would have either had to do something truly unspeakable, or done something seriously nasty while spending a Force Point. I've seen it happen on occasion where a GM (usually by accident rather than design) puts a character into a situation where playing the character in a realistic fashion did result in them doing something which gained them a Dark Side Point. It does occur that otherwise decent people are sometimes willing to step over certain moral lines for a strong enough set of reasons. ("This man must die, and if I have to live with a fracture in my soul for the rest of my life then so be it.") Those are rare situations in my experience though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16320
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Per the RAW, a non-FS character can only receive a DSP by spending a FP to commit an evil act. Which, I suppose, meets the definition of "truly unspeakable and nasty" in that he was really, really trying to succeed...
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've had to deal in game with someone wanting to play a NFS character who started with a DSP, and part of his reason for joinning the rebellion WAS his road to redemption.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tinman
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Posts: 110

PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

crmcneill wrote:
Per the RAW, a non-FS character can only receive a DSP by spending a FP to commit an evil act. Which, I suppose, meets the definition of "truly unspeakable and nasty" in that he was really, really trying to succeed...


Under almost all circumstances that's correct. Presumably (and this example is used in the published rules) ordering planetary scale genocide will earn you a Dark Side Point whether you're Force-Sensitive or not. (Tarkin would have had one on his character sheet if he'd survived the battle of Yavin. I suppose it COULD be argued that he was using a Force Point when he said "You may fire when ready," but I can't imagine why he would..) I'm sure people can think of other suitably heinous things, but they're not likely to become factors in most games I would assume.

The only example I can personally recall of a non-Force Sensitive character from one of our games gaining a Dark Side Point (and this did involve a character using a Force Point in the process) involved a character background driven circumstance which the GM overlooked at the time. The group was performing an espionage operation at an Imperial sector conference, and the character in question learned that a certain star destroyer captain was at that conference and went out of his way to brutally and unexpectedly stab him to death when the man was unarmed and not in a combat situation.

What was overlooked was that the character had (in previous gaming sessions) gone out of his way to find out the name of a ship which had bombed his home settlement and killed his entire family and everyone he'd ever known before joining the Rebellion. Every star destroyer captain in the sector was at the conference, so the character found the captain of that ship and made VERY sure he ended up VERY painfully dead while looking him in the eyes when it happened. The player didn't bother to give any warning of what his character was going to do, only explained afterwards why he did it, and did not argue with the acquisition of a Dark Side Point and fully expected that. The GM (and the rest of us) were just aghast at first because we'd completely forgotten about the character background stuff involved. (Probably he also hid his motives up until the last second because he didn't want to allow for any reasonable use of GM fait to prevent it.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crmcneill wrote:
Per the RAW, a non-FS character can only receive a DSP by spending a FP to commit an evil act. Which, I suppose, meets the definition of "truly unspeakable and nasty" in that he was really, really trying to succeed...


TO me, NFS should still be able to get DSPs even without doing evil on a FP.. just by being heinious in their acts.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online

PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The other night I awarded DSPs to two party members. One FS and other not. I assessed 2 DSP to the FS and 1 DSP to the non-FS. What happened? They captured some bounty hunters, tortured them by repeatedly blasting them into unconsciousness, entertaining throwing them off a 300+ meter landing pad, then decided to interrogate them by beating them, and ultimately chopping their hands off with a vibosword and using an ion manifold to cauterize the wounds. This was after being warned this would more than likely give a DSP.

Now I use a modified version called corruption. The rules are posted in a couple of spots.

So anyway, I dealt the FS an extra DSP because he was the instigator and driving force in the torture AND he was FS. The other I gave because an evil act is an evil act whether FS or non-FS. I am unfamiliar with a rule that says only FS can get DSP. That seems pretty silly to me.
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So they repeatedly blasted them into KO status - imo that would have racked up one DSP right there.
Entertained the thought of tossing them off a large building, no dsp since it was not acted on.
Tortured by beating them - DSP for the FS definitely. Not so much for the NFS.
Chopped hand off then cauterized it, - both get a DSP for gratuitous injury.

So from how i read it, 4 dsps to the force sensitive, and 3 for the non force sensitive.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shootingwomprats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 2690
Location: Online

PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I count 3 and 2 from your suggestions.
_________________
Don Diestler
Host, Shooting Womp Rats
The D6 Podcast
http://d6holocron.com/shootingwomprats
@swd6podcast, Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So repeatedl shooting a captive into unconsiousness then healing them up is not to you evil?
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lurker
Commander
Commander


Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 423
Location: Oklahoma

PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

garhkal wrote:
So repeatedl shooting a captive into unconsiousness then healing them up is not to you evil?


TO correct it, they had their blasters on stun. However, he would blast/stun the helpless bounty hunters BEFORE they regained consciousness, and just kept doing it over and over.
_________________
"And so I am become a knight of the Kingdom of Dreams and Shadows!" - Mark Twain

Forgive all spelling errors.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember in one of the novels someone mentioning that repeated close range stun shots can cause permanent nerve damage. So using that, would have had the BH start taking actual damage after a while to represent that actual nerve damage.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DougRed4
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Posts: 2286
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

crmcneill wrote:
Per the RAW, a non-FS character can only receive a DSP by spending a FP to commit an evil act. Which, I suppose, meets the definition of "truly unspeakable and nasty" in that he was really, really trying to succeed...


I don't remember ever reading this either. I just checked, and don't see anything in the RAW that says that.
_________________
Currently Running: Villains & Vigilantes (a 32-year-old campaign with multiple groups) and D6 Star Wars; mostly on hiatus are Adventures in Middle-earth and Delta Green
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Leon The Lion
Commander
Commander


Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 309
Location: Somewhere in Poland

PostPosted: Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DougRed4 wrote:
I don't remember ever reading this either. I just checked, and don't see anything in the RAW that says that.

It's not directly stated in the rules that I can find (I'm looking at 2ed.), but it's, I think, a logical conclusion from other rules.

Specifically, first, under spending and getting back Force Points, we are told that a character gets a Dark Side Point when he commits evil while spending a Force Point. Second, under Force-Sensitives, we are told, with special emphasis, that whenever a Force-sensitive character does evil, they get a Dark Side Point. Why the emphasis, if it's supposed to apply to everybody anyway?
_________________
Plagiarize! Let no one else's work evade your eyes,
Remember why the good Lord made your eyes! So don't shade your eyes,
But plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize... Only be sure to call it, please, "research".
- Tom Lehrer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16320
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DougRed4 wrote:
crmcneill wrote:
Per the RAW, a non-FS character can only receive a DSP by spending a FP to commit an evil act. Which, I suppose, meets the definition of "truly unspeakable and nasty" in that he was really, really trying to succeed...


I don't remember ever reading this either. I just checked, and don't see anything in the RAW that says that.


Hmm. I could've sworn I saw that somewhere, but I just rechecked the rulebook for it and couldn't find it...
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14215
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Page 84 in the section on spending force points and getting them back. It seems BY the reading that any one spending a FP to do evil (force sensitive or not) not only loses that force point but gains a DSP as well, while a little later it mentions force sensitives do so when doing evil, even if not on a FP.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Gamemasters All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0